We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The various scaling options available, such as step scaling, are particularly useful."
"The solution's monitoring effectively monitors our application and CPU utilization."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"Our internal business applications are hosted in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The health check integration feature ensures that the instances are healthy and capable of absorbing traffic, thus serving their purpose effectively."
"The good thing about Autoscaling is that it provides the capacity to minimize downtime. So, it gives you the assurance of stability and robustness within your system."
"When a lot of traffic comes into our organization, the product scales our instances based on our environment’s requirements."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it scales automatically without manual intervention based on the metrics we provide."
"The glass tables are very helpful."
"The observability is great and valuable."
"We liked the built-in calculation of health scores."
"Alerts and episodes are valuable to me."
"ITSI's most valuable feature is that it's easy to integrate DLP."
"The root cause analysis is very helpful for us."
"The KPS used to automate the integration policy is the most valuable feature of Splunk ITSI."
"We have a lot of teams using Splunk and they would be blind without it."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"The tool's stability could be improved."
"The tool must include AI features."
"It has latency issues. It depends on the distribution used, whether it's Amazon Linux, Windows Linux, etc. Occasionally, there are latency issues, which might lead to slower performance."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"Integration is the most critical area to improve in Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI). It wasn't a great experience because you had to do a little back and forth to integrate the solution."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
"After upgrading Splunk ITSI from version 4.11 to 4.13, the analyzer stopped finding values for KPS and services."
"It is pretty okay. I am not sure whether the current release has already moved to the new framework where instead of the glass tables, we can directly use the Dashboard Studio. It would be nice to have that integrated into the same framework."
"It would be good if an interface was included in the next release."
"Predictive analytics, in terms of preventing incidents before they occur, still needs time to mature."
"ITSI could benefit from a security model that would allow operations team members to get involved in model building, KPI implementation, and model maintenance, while maintaining appropriate segregation of duties."
"Splunk ITSI generates numerous false positives and has the potential for enhancement."
More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 27th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 28 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) writes "Provides great end-to-end visibility into our network environment and helped us reduce alert noise". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with Splunk Enterprise Security, whereas Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Grafana, Dynatrace, Splunk APM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
