We performed a comparison between Bitbucket Server and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."Our code is secure."
"It is an easily scalable solution."
"It is an amazingly stable solution."
"Bitbucket Server easily integrates with Jira because they are both Atlassian products."
"Bitbucket Server is easy to use. You can use other applications to access it, or you can use it to access the internet. You can use solutions, such as Sourcetree, which is free, and put it on your development system and use it to do the check-in, checkouts, and those type of operations. It is nice, but some other developers may agree."
"Bitbucket Server supports code collaboration by providing commands developers can use to check in code. Through comments, developers can specify the purpose of the code check-in. Additionally, Bitbucket allows tagging of code for releases."
"The product is easy to maintain."
"The tool makes pushing codes and setting up CI/CD pipelines easy."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"Bitbucket Server has limited user support for its free version. It is expensive."
"We opted for the on-premises solution, and while it's quite expensive, I believe there's room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"The response time of the product's support team may not be good enough to meet the expectations of users, making it an area where improvements are required."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it's not very user-friendly or intuitive."
"At the moment, there are not many details on how to proceed with the troubleshooting if one of the users faces an issue with the product."
"The tasks on Bitbucket must be automatically integrated into Jira."
"Enhancing the real-time reflection of changes online is an area that could benefit from improvement."
"It would have been better to use Bitbucket Server if it had something similar to the concept called GitHub Actions since it allows GitHub to provide seamless integration of CI/CD pipelines."
"The pricing is quite high."
Earn 20 points
Bitbucket Server is ranked 2nd in Version Control with 20 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control. Bitbucket Server is rated 8.4, while Liquibase is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of Bitbucket Server writes "An easy to use solution that works as a code repository for developers and helps them merge changes ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "A unique product that is easy to implement, with great automation capabilities ". Bitbucket Server is most compared with Bitbucket, Atlassian SourceTree, AWS CodeCommit and GitHub, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket, Git and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
