We performed a comparison between Blue Prism and Kryon RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The use cases range from document ingestion, process enablement, and data management, including financial records cleanup."
"The overall package from Blue Prism is valuable. I cannot pinpoint one certain part."
"Blue Prism is very good at doing background processing."
"The most valuable feature of Blue Prism is the control and development of the processes from one location."
"The tool's user interface is very intuitive."
"It offers assessments by way of a robotics or automation readiness assessment tool, which was quite helpful."
"The way you design the flow and configure the activities for the bot is very useful if you are working with any of the BPM or local platforms."
"It's fast to get up and running if you use a cloud deployment."
"The bot is typically about twice as fast as a person and more accurate, as long as the data going in is good. That is the biggest advantage."
"Kryon will allow you to automate processes fast and easy and you do not need to be a developer to automate processes."
"We use Kryon Studio to develop new wizards and we use the features to capture elements from the screen and automate processes... The screen capture allows us to interface with systems which don't have an API, or where the API is very expensive, and it allows us to do on-screen integration."
"Once I decide a process is suitable as a Kryon solution, the cycle of automation is quite quick. I learn about the manual process and I'm one of the two guys who program the Kryon environment. It's relatively simple. There are many details, but once you understand the concept it is quite easy."
"As a business user, it's so easy to use. With the recording of the processes, we didn't need to hire a specific developer... we are able to build most of our processes without having to develop the actual development skillset... the simplicity is the biggest win."
"We took a very complex business area, and every activity in it which can be done automatically is being replaced by the robot instead of people working on it."
"The number of commands it gives us to edit and modify is really good. It also captures screen activities and plays them back."
"It has been helpful in reducing the manpower and error rate since we are able to run tasks 24/7 without interruptions. As humans definitely take breaks and there may be absenteeism that is unexpected, the solution provides continuous work. Humans tend to make errors once in a while, but the solution has almost zero percent errors."
"We would like to see some desktop automation, although we have been told that the product is not going to be taken in that direction."
"The upgrades could be managed better. I would also like to see more true AI development and machine learning."
"It's not very easy to use. There is some learning curve that you need to manage as an individual."
"They can add a reporting feature."
"Blue Prism could be compatible with Oracle's suite of ERPs. We have seen some issues related to this. They could do much better with their intelligent document processing solution. They're pretty behind and don't have attended bots."
"We had a lot of challenges managing authentication and reusing or using external authentication providers."
"The solution could be more user-friendly. I would like the see the inclusion of a recording feature as in Microsoft, SAP, and other legacy systems. Users can play the recording and use it for future use cases. The recording can help with the automation and configuration. I would rate the tool’s interface a seven out of ten. It needs to improve."
"The domain in regards to cognitive abilities and the use of processing activity needs improvement. They have added this capability, but that's not really big in the public. It is more also available for gold partners. So they should improve the user activity for the public or even the regular customer."
"I would expect that in the first year there is no ROI. It has to be measured over three or five years."
"I would like to see a better OCR solution. That's the main thing: identifying unstructured data, like all paper documents and data from pictures."
"At first, we had problems with the object detection but in this latest release it has been better, and I think it keeps getting better."
"Kryon RPA need to enhance the robustness of our multi-board architecture to ensure the availability of bots on multiple machines."
"Extracting meaningful data requires significant effort. You need a dedicated business analyst who can understand the output."
"The process discovery tool of Kryon RPA could be improved because of its limitations."
"It could be more reliable in spying HTML."
"Another major drawback is OCR. We are not able to read scanned documents correctly in a reliable way. There is always some margin of error. Some of the processes require us to read scanned documents, and you need to ensure that it is 100 percent accurate. Without that level of assurance, you can't automate such tasks."
Blue Prism is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 86 reviews while Kryon RPA is ranked 13th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 26 reviews. Blue Prism is rated 7.8, while Kryon RPA is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Blue Prism writes "Way more efficient for debugging than other tools but the UI is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kryon RPA writes "The tool helps with speed to market, efficiency, and accuracy". Blue Prism is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition, whereas Kryon RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Nintex RPA, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Jiffy.ai Automate. See our Blue Prism vs. Kryon RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.