We performed a comparison between Blue Prism and Nintex RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."My company decided to go with Blue Prism because of the security it provides."
"The solution is way more efficient for debugging than other tools."
"The multi-bot architecture is very flexible."
"The automation on offer is great."
"The web-based designer is very user-friendly and easy to use."
"For one, it's easy to set up, and once it gets running it can handle multiple processes in an efficient manner. It's a very robust system."
"The use cases range from document ingestion, process enablement, and data management, including financial records cleanup."
"Blue Prism is a mature, stable product with lots of built-in features."
"Nintex RPA doesn't require much coding, and you can drag and drop the activities."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Nintex RPA often includes security features, including encryption and user access controls, which ensure the protection of sensitive data and compliance with security standards."
"I would like to see the vendor improve the efficiency of Blue Prism interaction with applications."
"The assisted automation functionality needs improvement."
"I would like to see machine learning functionality integrated with the automation."
"Blue Prism can improve a lot. The interaction with Google Chrome can be massively improved. I know in the next version there are slight improvements. We don't know how much, but we are comparing them. At this moment, Google Chrome is a massive issue within the toolset, due to the way Google Chrome receives updates regularly but Blue Prism is unable to cope. The spy method of Google Chrome is not as user-friendly as Internet Explorer is. However, Internet Explorer is being discontinued from their support, therefore it's not the best browser to be using. This has caused us major issues in the last six months."
"The reporting system, specifically the system admin reporting could be improved."
"We had a lot of challenges managing authentication and reusing or using external authentication providers."
"All of the processes that we've automated have been completed successfully, and the bots are able to process them as expected."
"The solution could be more user-friendly. I would like the see the inclusion of a recording feature as in Microsoft, SAP, and other legacy systems. Users can play the recording and use it for future use cases. The recording can help with the automation and configuration. I would rate the tool’s interface a seven out of ten. It needs to improve."
"Nintex RPA is not suitable for PDF automation."
"There could be some features to fix compatibility issues with firmware."
"Further simplifying the low-code development process can attract a broader user base by making automation accessible to those with minimal technical skills."
Blue Prism is ranked 4th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 86 reviews while Nintex RPA is ranked 28th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 3 reviews. Blue Prism is rated 7.8, while Nintex RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Blue Prism writes "Way more efficient for debugging than other tools but the UI is complicated". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nintex RPA writes "Helps automate tasks and increases efficiency but does stop working sometimes". Blue Prism is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Pega Robotic Process Automation and Tungsten RPA, whereas Nintex RPA is most compared with Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Kryon RPA and Automation Anywhere (AA). See our Blue Prism vs. Nintex RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.