We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"The tool's most valuable features I've found are related to debugging and testing. It makes it easy to track execution, documents, and process history. This functionality is particularly useful for identifying issues with data and providing insights to the business."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"Very effective with its drag-and-drop feature."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The exchange and API management features are the best in the market."
"The initial setup is quite easy because the solution has a good interface through which the configuration, mapping, and so on can be done."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is a huge list of available connectors for a lot of different platforms, which we can use very easily."
"The most valuable features for us are flexibility, all the features related to connectivity with multiple connectors to the business, and the flexibility of on-premises and cloud deployments."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"In my experience, I haven't encountered any major issues with the tool. However, there could be a learning curve for new users, especially depending on which tool you're using. For example, I've used MuleSoft in the past, which is more code-oriented and requires knowledge of Java. Transitioning to Boomi AtomSphere Integration took me a couple of months because of differences in terminology."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"There is no validation in the mapping profile custom scripting, such as IntelliSense or advanced error checking."
"In day-to-day operations, tracking transactions is a major challenge. It takes hours to track a single transaction. It is not a straightforward process."
"Its documentation needed a little bit of work to make it more usable. It is a platform that is used mainly by developers and other people for connecting systems. Its documentation was confusing in some areas and was not very helpful in other areas. I had to go to a consultant to get some work done, which ideally shouldn't be required."
"Although the solution's proxy design and process are good, it faces connecting issues because it lacks data integration."
"An on-premise setup requires special skills and you need a lot of professional services."
"Mule Anypoint Platform is complex for beginners. Users without programming skills will find it complex. It should also improve its pricing."
"The high price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
"The solution's licensing methodologies could be improved."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 1st in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 40 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and TIBCO BusinessWorks, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, Oracle Integration Cloud Service, SAP Process Orchestration and SAP Cloud Platform. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.