We performed a comparison between Cisco TelePresence and Webex based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable features of Cisco TelePresence are the basic standard features and the ease of use. Additionally, the configuration and integration are exemplary."
"PresenterTrack cameras improve the meeting experience."
"We have a dual screen option to enable video and content sharing."
"It was stable. So, I would rate the stability a ten out of ten."
"Telepresence's most valuable feature is keeping highly paid employees, such as executives, on the ground instead of wasting time flying around the world. So if you have the right telepresence plan and form, it's not just the video cameras and the systems behind them, it's the way you lay out your meeting room.You can have multiple offices interconnecting in a single meeting, and it looks like everybody's in the same big conference room together because the telepresence yields such a fantastic amount of clarity."
"The configuration is a valuable."
"TelePresence allows our customers to have a quick meeting while traveling and still be effective. It saves time and money."
"The SpeakerTrack feature is the most valuable feature."
"As compared to Zoom, I like its user interface more. It is much easier to use, and I also find it more stable."
"The video quality is good."
"Screen share is the most valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the ease of use."
"Integrates well with other Cisco solutions."
"The solution is useful for communication."
"I have found Webex to be stable."
"The most valuable features of Webex are the depth of the tone and the quality of the picture. I find them better than Teams or Zoom."
"The price of Cisco TelePresence overall should be reduced."
"I was in touch with one of our clients and they mentioned that they would like to have a holographic video conferencing. It would be great if that feature would be added."
"MX800 comes only with one available DVI port. A few more HDMI ports will improve the system's capability."
"The tool is expensive."
"The calling features can be improved."
"I would rate my experience with the initial setup a three out of ten, with ten being expensive. It was complex with badges and certificates. Too crazy."
"The only thing it maybe needs is a chat."
"The accessibility of the share screen option provided by the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"This service could be improved by implementing integration with Microsoft platforms. If you are on a call with Webex, you can get a call from Teams or Skype for Business without receiving any indication."
"We have had issues where some of the invited participants are not able to join the meeting."
"The collaborative features could improve in Webex. There should not be the typical one on one connection that we have had in the past."
"I do not like the solutions functions."
"The performance is not always good and could be improved."
"Although we utilize it for team collaboration, it's not very efficient. Most people don't bother turning on their video during meetings. We feel stuck in the past, relying on outdated technology."
Cisco TelePresence is ranked 9th in Virtual Meetings with 7 reviews while Webex is ranked 2nd in Virtual Meetings with 113 reviews. Cisco TelePresence is rated 8.0, while Webex is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Cisco TelePresence writes "A scalable solution that needs some improvement in pricing and stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Webex writes "Used to conduct online third-party client meetings or third-party vendor meetings". Cisco TelePresence is most compared with Zoom, Polycom RealPresence Clariti and Cisco Meeting Server, whereas Webex is most compared with Cisco Meeting Server, TeamViewer, Skype for Business, Zoom and Huawei Video Conferencing Platform. See our Cisco TelePresence vs. Webex report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
