We performed a comparison between SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cynet based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: SentinelOne Singularity Complete is praised for its dependable threat prevention and ability to reverse ransomware file encryption. Cynet offers strong ransomware protection and an intuitive interface. SentinelOne could improve its automation, machine learning, and AI capabilities while improving reporting and integration. Users suggest improving network monitoring and strengthening integration with other tools. Cynet needs to expand device support and add customization options.
Service and Support: Customers have been pleased with SentinelOne’s customer service. Reviews highlighted the support team’s responsiveness and efficiency. Cynet's customer service is consistently lauded for its excellence. They have a dedicated support team that is available round the clock, and they also have a contingency plan for urgent incidents.
Ease of Deployment: Users find the initial setup for SentinelOne Singularity Complete to be quick and painless, with helpful support from the vendor team. Cynet’s setup is highly efficient, with the ability to configure thousands of devices quickly.
Pricing: Some reviewers thought SentinelOne Singularity Complete is reasonably priced and competitive, while others say it’s costlier than many alternatives. Customers generally view Cynet's pricing and licensing experience as affordable and a good value for its features.
ROI: SentinelOne Singularity Complete yields an ROI by saving money and protecting against ransom attacks. Other users noted its valuable dashboard data and low CapEx requirements. Cynet yields an excellent ROI by preventing cyberattacks and safeguarding sensitive data.
Comparison Results: Our users prefer SentinelOne Singularity Complete over Cynet. They highlight the solution's effectiveness in mitigating threats and protecting against ransomware. Users also appreciate its comprehensive protection, user-friendly interface, and valuable features like Ranger functionality. Cynet users suggest improvements in device support, customization options, and network monitoring.
"The EDR features are valuable. By getting the EDR features, we have more control over the device. We have information about events in real-time and more protection against zero-day threats and zero-day vulnerabilities. We can monitor every event or action that a device is going through. We can get an idea if it is something malicious or if we have to take any actions."
"There is also one dashboard that shows us the status of many controls at once and the details I can get... It gives a great overview of many areas, such as files, emails, chats, and links. Even with the apps, it gives you a great overview. In one place you can see where you should look into things more deeply..."
"We are connected to Microsoft and have every laptop enrolled. This acts as an endpoint. The tool helps me check security and compliance. I can also check what a device is doing."
"Email protection is the most valuable feature of Microsoft Defender XDR."
"We are able to consolidate licences and make use of many Microsoft products using this solution. If we have any Microsoft customers, we encourage them to use this solution for enterprise defence."
"All of the security components are valuable including, antiphishing, antispam, and stage three antivirus."
"Advanced hunting is good. I like that. We can drill down to lots of details."
"I like Defender XDR's automation capabilities. XDR isn't automated by default, but you can automate it to respond. If an attack is performed anywhere within the organization, you can isolate that instance from the network. This is what I can figure out for it. When integrated with Sentinel, you can set up playbooks to automate all the alerts gathered on Sentinel from different Microsoft solutions. Sentinel has a wider range of capabilities than XDR."
"This solution requires less management and is very easy to use."
"The level of automation is very good because the majority of the time, it blocks the attacks without requiring anything from our side. The technicians don't have to do anything. They are just alerted about what happened. So, the user intelligence works quite well."
"The dashboard is beautiful, overall easy of use, and the UBA and NBA features are valued."
"We are protecting all our workstations."
"The initial setup is very fast and very easy."
"I like the Cynet Correlator™ feature."
"Cynet is unique in that it has almost everything included and it was built up from the ground, instead of a bundle of purchased and composed modules. It gives you easier very good visibility than Sentinel One as well as a lower maintenance burden."
"Cynet's most valuable features are laptop and server performance, internal network monitoring, and external firewall lock management."
"The most valuable feature of SentinelOne is the EDR functionality. We are protected against threats, such as ransomware."
"The tool's most valuable feature is EDR."
"The deep visibility is really important for us. With it, we can really look deep into some of the incidents."
"They provide a map, a process tree, and that is pretty good for analysis."
"Its ability to interact with other third-party tools has been great for us. It can work through APIs and partners and integrate well."
"I have found the activity timeline and threat analysis to be particularly useful."
"It is a robust solution. It provides great visibility."
"Deep Visibility is a valuable feature."
"The only problem I find is that the use cases are built-in. There is no template available that you can modify according to your organization's standards. What they give is very generic, the market standard, but that might not be applicable to every organization."
"The management and automation of the cloud apps have room for improvement."
"The capability to not only thwart attacks but also to adapt to evolving threats is crucial."
"Sometimes, configurations take much longer than expected."
"This solution could be improved if it included features such as those offered by Malwarebytes."
"There is no common area where we can manage all the policies for the EDR, third-party solutions, devices, servers, Windows, Mac, etc., but it's on the road map, and we ware waiting for that feature."
"One of the biggest downsides of Microsoft products, in general, is that the menus are often difficult to find, as they tend to move from place to place between versions."
"Defender also lacks automated detection and response. You need to resolve issues manually. You can manage multiple Microsoft security products from a single portal, and all your security recommendations are in one place. It's easy to understand and manage. However, I wouldn't say Defender is a single pane of glass. You still need to switch between all of the available Microsoft tools. You can see all the alerts in one panel, but you can't automate remediation."
"The reporting functionality in Cynet may not be as comprehensive or flexible as desired."
"I think the technical support could be better."
"Increased application for SOAR abilities across interconnected devices would be a welcome improvement."
"There could be more customization options and detailed information provided in the reports."
"The command line interface could be improved."
"I cannot provide more details about Cynet's automation features. While Cynet claims to be automated, the specifics of this automation are unclear. They claim to have a high capability to detect and block attacks, but I am cautious about companies that claim to solve every problem without limitations. It does help in identifying malware on the network but doesn't specifically identify vulnerabilities."
"Cynet could improve when a reverse proxy is being used to connect to the servers. There could be an easier configuration because it is not plug-and-play."
"Its dashboard is not so good. On the dashboard, they don't show the count for client endpoints, which is a failure of this product. This count should be shown on the dashboard. I have 1,000 clients, but I can't see it anywhere on the dashboard."
"The role-based access is in dire need of improvement. We actually discussed this on a roadmap call and were informed that it was coming, but then it was delayed. It limits the roles that you can have in the platform, and we require several custom roles. We work with a lot of third-parties whom we rely on for some of our IT services. Part of those are an external SOC function where they are over-provisioned in the solution because there isn't anything relevant for the level of work that they do."
"We often experience interruptions to our investigations in SentinelOne Singularity Complete."
"We did use the Ranger functionality. However, there was some scanning going on and it caused a lot of noise, so we had to disable it."
"The management console."
"I would like SentinelOne to add a threat-hunting report and more UEBA features. They could add more SIEM functionality. It would be nice to have the ability to easily drag all the logs from the agents, so there's no need for multiple agents installed on the endpoint."
"The only concern we have is that there are a few features that were not readily available."
"SentinelOne Singularity Complete could improve by having DNS filtering. Other competitor solutions have this feature."
"It primarily operates on local machines, monitoring processes, and not always providing detailed insights, relying on external information to determine the nature of a file."
More SentinelOne Singularity Complete Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cynet is ranked 17th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 35 reviews while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is ranked 2nd in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 176 reviews. Cynet is rated 8.8, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cynet writes "Provides memory protection, device control, and vulnerability management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SentinelOne Singularity Complete writes "Provides peace of mind and is good at ingesting data and correlating". Cynet is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks and Stellar Cyber Open XDR, whereas SentinelOne Singularity Complete is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, ThreatLocker Protect and Intercept X Endpoint. See our Cynet vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete report.
See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors, best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors, and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
