We performed a comparison between Google Cloud Storage and Wasabi based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Public Cloud Storage Services solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."On the phone, I appreciate how seamless it is."
"The most valuable feature of Google Cloud Storage is that the backup feature is always on."
"It's easy to use."
"The solution is already stable and I have not encountered problems in this regard."
"Google Cloud is handy and easy to use."
"It’s very stable."
"The most valuable features of Google Cloud Storage are flexibility and sustainability."
"We are satisfied with the parameters of Google Cloud Storage."
"We can store our videos on hot storage, allowing immediate access to them."
"The tool is very user-friendly."
"Basically, I set Wasabi up and forget it. I'll monitor it every once in a while just to make sure that it's working correctly."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is its cost."
"The most valuable feature of Wasabi is the backups."
"Wasabi is an easy-to-use solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution must provide some accessibility features."
"I would prefer more support for alternative operating systems like DSD. The performance could be better because sometimes there are glitches. The price could be better."
"They need to get some parts of the program more mature, like the admin management part as well as the monitoring part."
"Google Cloud Storage can improve by having better integration and migration tools."
"I'd like the solution to integrate better with other clouds, including the Apple cloud."
"Having more storage space would be an improvement."
"The tool should be cheaper."
"I would like the storage to be less expensive."
"The solution’s user reporting could be improved."
"The scalability could improve."
"The solution must allow the extension of the retention period."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Having the ability to upload and download data using third-party apps such as Mega which can sync to the desktop would be excellent."
"I don't have enough experience to understand the nuances of where they might improve."
"Setting up users on the appliance should be improved."
Google Cloud Storage is ranked 4th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 66 reviews while Wasabi is ranked 8th in Public Cloud Storage Services with 7 reviews. Google Cloud Storage is rated 8.8, while Wasabi is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Google Cloud Storage writes "Flexible, reliable, and beneficial for small sized companies". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Wasabi writes "An easy-to-use solution that can be used to move local backups to the cloud". Google Cloud Storage is most compared with Amazon S3 Glacier, AT&T Cloud Storage, Amazon EFS (Elastic File System), Microsoft Azure File Storage and Huawei FusionStorage, whereas Wasabi is most compared with Microsoft Azure File Storage, Amazon S3 Glacier, Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure Object Storage and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP. See our Google Cloud Storage vs. Wasabi report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.
We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
