We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We made the transformation to agile. Altogether with BPM, it is the total package."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"This solution is very stable."
"Overall, I'm satisfied with the product. If you compare it with other products, it's probably not as easygoing or as simple to implement as the rest. But after you get used to it, it works. It has a lot of capabilities and potential, but the people, who come from different technologies, have some difficulty getting used to the way of working with IBM products."
"The most valuable features are the integration capabilities - BPM can connect with almost any legacy or advanced system."
"Compliance with the BPMN 2.0 standard."
"I like the APIs and the BPM coach is a good tool. But if I had to pick one, it would be the API."
"The installation was straightforward."
"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."
"Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."
"Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"It has simplified compliance with regulations and company standards."
"Provides a valuable BPMN feature."
"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."
"Simulation is most valuable."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"All our clients are changing to microservice and cloud service. However, BPM does not have a solution for microservice and cloud service."
"I'd like the tool to be more flexible."
"The price and the overall installation process could be improved."
"IBM BPM integrated with Spark UI and the UI is now much better, but they still need to improve the UI because competitors have predefined templates and other additional features. In these competitor's solutions, you are able to use the templates, map your data, and the form is ready to use. With this solution, you need to write a lot of code to have the same quality as the competitor's templates. It would be a benefit to make this platform more towards low-code or no-code."
"It can definitely be improved in terms of performance and stability."
"I would like it more documentation during the design phase."
"IBM BPM uses JavaScript as a programming language for the server-side. I don’t know why it’s not Java, as it’s more powerful and the JavaScript part is translated into Java anyway."
"With iGrafx, the implementation and the licensing were pretty complex."
"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."
"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."
"It can be more user-friendly."
"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."
"Dragging and dropping shapes is not as user-friendly as in Visio. In Visio, it's very easy to work with shapes and in very few minutes you can plot a whole, multi swim-lane, cross-functional process."
"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."
"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."
More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is ranked 21st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 15 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform writes " A reasonably stable BPM solution useful for process governance and process mining". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is most compared with Visio, ARIS BPA, SAP Signavio Process Manager, Camunda and Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect. See our IBM BPM vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
