We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and OpenText Operations Orchestration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation."IBM BPM is stable."
"Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"It is a very powerful solution."
"Its dashboard is easy to use and very good. It allows us to customize."
"We have automated processes with IBM BPM and DocuSign. Its valuable features include low-code, timer, etc. It makes it simple to implement the products. We generate reports using the solution."
"It is a stale solution."
"It makes the company business processes work more efficiently."
"Automation is the most valuable feature of IBM BPM."
"It has reduced the time taken to go to market. In the past, we were struggling with building these integrations, but now the process has sped up and there is an added advantage of quick delivery. In addition, it is an agent-less solution, which provides more flexibility in terms of multiple options."
"It's very stable. If you ask me for the success rate metrics, it's more than 90% for both."
"The product is good functionality-wise. I am impressed with the tool's flexibility in customization."
"If the processing gets better, it would be more efficient."
"IBM BPM can improve the dashboards and reports. It only has two dashboards, and reporting is very difficult to build."
"When you have to integrate files for enterprise applications."
"We thought there might have been a little more discussion early on about, "Hey, if you're doing this, set it up this way," or some best practices or some guidance that we didn't get."
"I would like to see a lot more case studies."
"I would like to see more inclusion of RPA technologies. If we have more manual processes, we can use robotic process automation and integrate that in with the solution."
"It is not user-friendly."
"Some of the features are not enough for my business. We need to build custom user management for the many end users affected by BPM."
"The price is an area that should be addressed because the price is high."
"There were a lot of scalability issues that we initially faced. Whenever I tried to deploy 100-200 endpoints, it became a huge challenge. We had to actually start using other tools like Tivoli Endpoint Management in order to patch the issues."
"The tool's UI needs to be improved. It needs to have better administration features in future releases."
More OpenText Operations Orchestration Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Process Automation with 105 reviews while OpenText Operations Orchestration is ranked 17th in Process Automation with 24 reviews. IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while OpenText Operations Orchestration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Operations Orchestration writes "HP OO blows away the competition, but has its fair share of flaws". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Appian, Pega BPM, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas OpenText Operations Orchestration is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Control-M, Camunda, BigFix and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.