We performed a comparison between IBM BPM and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."With the tester coach wherein you can interact with the interface while you're designing the process."
"It is easy to take a requirement, put it in the code, and deploy it."
"Setting it up is fairly easy. If somebody has knowledge of the system, he or she will be able to do it fairly quickly."
"Technical support is pleasant to work with and always available."
"We can scale by increasing the infrastructure which is currently running."
"I would say that I like its GUI designer the best."
"This solution is very stable."
"Enabled us to convert most of the paper-based work into an automated workflow process, and some of them were converted into straight-through processing, with no human interaction involved whatsoever."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"There are a few areas, like triggering mechanisms, externally exposed variables, and changing its values."
"We would appreciate more user-friendly definitions of processes with a more user-friendly interface for documenting processes."
"Some of the features are not enough for my business. We need to build custom user management for the many end users affected by BPM."
"I would like IBM to consider including AI-enabled process mining, robotic process automation, and very good OCR capabilities from the computer vision side."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
"We are a government organization, and we are the largest government power sector in India. We generate around 30% of power in India. Therefore, our processes are quite complex. Although IBM BPM is a low-code or no-code software, if you want to have extremely complex workflows, just the business process diagrams are not helpful in creating those workflows. While implementing complex workflows, only the process flow diagrams did not help us. We had to write a lot of Java scripts and Java queries to achieve what we wanted. Its integration capabilities with the SAP environment have to be improved. At present, we are only talking at the web services environment level. Its price also needs to be improved. It is currently expensive. Previously, Active Directory required a heterogeneous environment, but now they want a homogeneous environment. We had onboarded employees through Microsoft Active Directory, and now I have to implement Microsoft AD only from the cloud for my vendors."
"There needs to be better documentation for IBM BPM in a central place. There is not any standard documentation for each component available and has been a barrier for developers."
"Consider an admin console during deployment. I would like to migrate single instances, not the whole bunch at once."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
IBM BPM is ranked 5th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 105 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM BPM is rated 7.8, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM BPM writes "Offers good case management and its integration with process design but there's a learning curve". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". IBM BPM is most compared with Camunda, Pega BPM, Appian, IBM Business Automation Workflow and Apache Airflow, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM, Pega BPM and Camunda. See our IBM BPM vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.