We performed a comparison between IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."For our office workers who are not based in Norway, when we order the PC, we can do some of the settings for them. These are standardized settings. We can set them up exactly as they are in Norway so that they're the same."
"At the moment, Autopilot is the most valuable feature."
"Easy to use."
"The stability of Microsoft Intune is good."
"It is a comprehensive security solution that not only controls access to enterprise resources but also tracks and prevents unauthorized access, ensuring the protection of sensitive data and preventing potential data loss scenarios."
"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."
"The features I found most valuable in Intune are its user visibility and troubleshooting options."
"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."
"Mobile Device Configuration with policy applying: This significantly reduces time of device configuration."
"Mobile Device Management, Secure Productivity Suite, and document management are valuable features."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are remote control and setting up a phone."
"The most valuable feature is that it's comprehensive - it covers mobile devices and laptops in one package."
"The most valuable features of IBM MaaS360 are encryption and mobile design."
"Asset management is the most valuable feature and integral for device inventory."
"The most valuable features are mobile device management and security (which allows you to quarantine infected devices)."
"Using this solution has made things more convenient. Earlier, we had to depend a lot more on IT to find and resolve our issues."
"Can manage a large fleet of devices without any outside interference."
"While Intune works perfectly well, the only potential downside is that the deployment could be a bit complex for some users."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"In terms of what can be improved, I am looking for better enhancements regarding Apple management, not only on the mobile device, but also on the laptop."
"The documentation about the custom image setup could be better. Although Microsoft provides the steps to configure Intune or set up or deploy Intune, it doesn't have much information related to custom images. If you ask, "how can we deploy the custom image?" There is no information. The steps they mention ask you to connect to your on-premises environment or create your own image on the cloud itself once there is connectivity. But I needed to go to multiple websites to get all this information. I had to figure out how to upload the custom image if you want to use the on-premise custom image for Cloud PC. If you have the proper subscription, you must have the right access, like global admin or owner. Then you can add your custom image to that. There are no steps mentioned over there. Microsoft Intune doesn't have Chrome browser support. I would like to have that support because they will want it if we pitch the product to clients."
"There are a few security features that are not available in Microsoft Intune, when compared to other products."
"There can be more logs. I do not have any other requirements."
"An issue we have run into with Microsoft Endpoint Manager is that we cannot patch third-party products like Adobe and Chrome with it."
"There are a lot of small use cases where we realized that some technical solution was missing in Microsoft in comparison to other products. For example, it lacks something similar to sensing or location-based rules and configurations."
"IBM MaaS360 needs to have stronger points when it comes to the area of BYOD."
"The look needs to be updated and it could be simpler to use."
"The price could be lower."
"The UI has room for improvement."
"We opted to go with Microsoft Intune because it just seemed to be a more mature and comprehensive enterprise solution, whereas IBM MaaS360 didn't seem to have the necessary breadth to manage all of our equipment. Along with laptops, I've had some BYODs. IBM MaaS360 just didn't seem as mature in our assessment."
"The solution needs to offer live technical support. Right now, it's just a chat window and it's rather unhelpful."
"Can be added process of export/import environment configuration to simplify any migration processes."
"Sometimes IBM MaaS360 seems buggy...The solution's technical support team is sometimes slow to respond and not competent enough."
"Lacks a factory reset feature."
IBM MaaS360 is ranked 8th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 34 reviews while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is ranked 11th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 1 review. IBM MaaS360 is rated 7.8, while ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM MaaS360 writes "It lets you separate work and personal data on mobile phones, but the interface is outdated and clunky". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus writes "Great features with very good function management". IBM MaaS360 is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, SOTI MobiControl, Jamf Pro, IBM MobileFirst and Sophos Mobile, whereas ManageEngine Mobile Device Manager Plus is most compared with ManageEngine Endpoint Central, Google Endpoint Management, VMware Workspace ONE and SOTI MobiControl.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.