We performed a comparison between KiSSFLOW and Software AG ARIS Process Mining based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Performance Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I work in HR and am fond of automation. I like the tool's email automation and integration with Outlook."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The most valuable feature is APIs. Its integrations are very flexible, allowing developers to connect multiple applications like DocuSign, Salesforce, OpenText, and SEB."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The support team responds fast."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"One feature I found really cool was the Conformance Engine."
"It is very easy to work on the way the ETL happens in ARIS Process Mining."
"The interface is simplified and easy to use."
"It is a stable solution...I rate the technical support a ten out of ten...On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I rate the setup a nine."
"I have found Software AG ARIS Process Mining scalable."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"There is a lag in the delay between API calls."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"The integration between forms should be made easier."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
"Customizing KPIs and building dashboards were not as intuitive as other similar tools."
"I guess we have many unnecessary steps within our processes. There is room for automation and room for enhancement within our application portfolio management...In short, I would like to eliminate unnecessary steps in some processes in this solution."
"The installation is straightforward, we didn't have any technical issues with installing. However, we needed support to complete the implementation."
"When the process models are transferred back to the design environment for further optimization and simulations, we need to see some improvements in the way the models get created in the design."
"There should be a single site for modeling and mining."
More Software AG ARIS Process Mining Pricing and Cost Advice →
KiSSFLOW is ranked 6th in Business Performance Management with 12 reviews while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is ranked 14th in Business Performance Management with 6 reviews. KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6, while Software AG ARIS Process Mining is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Software AG ARIS Process Mining writes "An easy-to-use interface with quite good learning center and documentation". KiSSFLOW is most compared with Camunda, Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform and OutSystems, whereas Software AG ARIS Process Mining is most compared with Celonis, SAP Signavio Process Intelligence, UiPath Process Mining and Anaplan. See our KiSSFLOW vs. Software AG ARIS Process Mining report.
See our list of best Business Performance Management vendors.
We monitor all Business Performance Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.