We performed a comparison between Liferay Digital Experience Platform and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Web Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The web/mobile/portal integration was one of the features that we found most valuable, primarily because it reduced our development time."
"We chose Liferay because it is open-source and that we can make any number of users apply, register into the system and use the system, as opposed to other solutions where the cost is based on user licenses. This is one of the most attractive features."
"The integration capabilities of the product are super easy to use."
"The solution is easy to install."
"I think that it could be interesting to expand the eCommerce capabilities to the B2C sector."
"The look and feel and the user interface are great."
"Manageability is very good and probably the most valuable part of a tool of this type. There is a little more of a learning curve than you have with a simple tool, but a business user can learn to manage the system as an administrator very easily."
"It allows us to arrange and develop new ideas, then incorporate them into the portal. We can create a one stop information center, so people can access the information from one window."
"The solution's technical support team is helpful."
"Teams' most valuable feature is the ability to choose from multiple numbers to show when calling."
"The initial setup was okay."
"Using the solution's screen-sharing feature, we can go through a document together and take control."
"Microsoft Teams is much more stable than other solutions like Skype for Business."
"Compared to Zoom, Microsoft Teams is a very good solution and works well."
"The tool's user interface is very good."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is that it can be included in most systems...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The documentation provided needs to be more detailed. It's sometimes hard to develop things because the documentation is so sparse."
"Social area and capabilities need improvement."
"It could have better built-in integration with a wider variety of extensions out-of-the-box."
"The integration and configuration need to be simplified."
"The plugins should be more affordable."
"It could be improved in terms of adding filters to some of the rules. Therefore, you can retain how long a document would need to stay in an archive."
"Lacking in more complex hierarchies for files and teams."
"There are some issues with stability."
"Allowing you to participate in the conference to which you have been invited regardless of the platform on which it is hosted would be beneficial."
"The tool lacks AI. We will require AI in the solution to be able to integrate with all other tools."
"The integration with SharePoint can be cumbersome at times."
"They should allow switching between windows in a Teams meeting."
"Technical support could be improved."
"One area that could be improved is the authentication process, especially related to Windows sign-on authentication."
More Liferay Digital Experience Platform Pricing and Cost Advice →
Liferay Digital Experience Platform is ranked 4th in Web Content Management with 44 reviews while Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews. Liferay Digital Experience Platform is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Liferay Digital Experience Platform writes "Offers integration capabilities that are very easy to use". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". Liferay Digital Experience Platform is most compared with Adobe Experience Manager, WordPress, Magnolia CMS, SharePoint and Drupal, whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Chatter. See our Liferay Digital Experience Platform vs. Microsoft Teams report.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.