Microsoft Teams vs SharePoint comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
220 views|96 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
7,894 views|6,463 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Microsoft Teams and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint Report (Updated: January 2023).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We use Microsoft Teams for group communications.""Microsoft Teams is much more stable than other solutions like Skype for Business.""It allows us to invite members to attend the meeting efficiently.""Integration with document management capabilities and video conferencing.""The most valuable feature of Microsoft Teams is its video calling.""When comparing similar solutions, there aren't many differences between them, but the best feature I would highlight is the quality and stability of their platform.""In general, Teams allows me to connect with anyone in the organization and share files with the team.""Microsoft Teams is bundled with Microsoft, so that's the number one valuable feature for me. It's easy to use."

More Microsoft Teams Pros →

"It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint.""Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals.""For SharePoint, I believe the most valuable feature is the customization and allowing you to share and edit files and documents. Being able to share externally and the precise administration of the files in terms of giving permissions and controlling who has access to what is a very good feature.""It is very stable.""Its functionality is enormous.""It improved transparency around work products.""It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place.""SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories."

More SharePoint Pros →

Cons
"The remote control needs some improvement.""The solution's interface probably needs to be a bit different in terms of cloud sharing.""Microsoft Teams could improve the integration with Outlook because most of us are not using the last version of Outlook and it causes some issues.""The UI can be further improved upon. When I used to use Skype, Skype was a small window that opened on your desktop. With Teams, when you use it, it occupies your full screen just like if you were in Word or Excel. Skype worked more like an app, which I preferred. I liked being able to use it in a minimized screen. If Teams could emulate that a bit, it would be a better user experience.""They should add an integration API for the solution.""The software could be optimized for Mac systems because sometimes it is slow and consumes a lot of memory.""The product should improve its security.""In future releases, short voice messages would be useful."

More Microsoft Teams Cons →

"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved.""You still need a bit of expertise to add branding.""SharePoint Online could improve the user interface and when modifying any of the user interfaces can be challenging. Additionally, there are challenges with the detail in the analytics user interface and the overall customization could improve.""The management of the product/back-end is complex.""Needs improvement on the user interface.""It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI.""It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family.""This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."

More SharePoint Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Pricing is free to a threshold and then after that you have to license per user."
  • "It is the standard license which is part of many Office packets."
  • "We are satisfied with the price of this solution."
  • "If you have content that requires more security and you want to use it in a more secure manner, with more protection, then it will come at a higher cost."
  • "If you have clients who do not have a computer and are joining with their phones it's an additional fee of $5.00 per user."
  • "The pricing for Teams is very competitive."
  • "My understanding is that there are licensing fees, but I'm not sure how much they might be."
  • "It is affordable because it also includes the licenses on Microsoft Word, Microsoft Office and SharePoint."
  • More Microsoft Teams Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:It's great for meetings and even hybrid classes, for example, where the teacher has students attending in person and online at the same time. It's really convenient for that too, and I like that you… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is okay. The higher education department manages the subscription, so I am unaware of the licensing costs.
    Top Answer:The only issue is sometimes, when I share my screen, and there's text on it, the compression can make it very blurry. If Teams could solve this problem so that text remains clear during screen… more »
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Ranking
    5th
    out of 63 in Virtual Meetings
    Views
    220
    Comparisons
    96
    Reviews
    106
    Average Words per Review
    331
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    7,894
    Comparisons
    6,463
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Citrix ShareFile logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Dropbox logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Box logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Objective ECM logo
    Compared 3% of the time.
    Also Known As
    MS Teams
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    At Microsoft, our mission is to empower every person and every organization on the planet to achieve more. Our mission is grounded in both the world in which we live and the future we strive to create. Today, we live in a mobile-first, cloud-first world, and the transformation we are driving across our businesses is designed to enable Microsoft and our customers to thrive in this world.

    We do business in 170 countries and are made up of 114,000 passionate employees dedicated to fulfilling our mission of helping you and your organization achieve more.

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Sample Customers
    Honeywll, AIRFRANCE, AccuWeather, Lilly
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm16%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Government4%
    Computer Software Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business34%
    Midsize Enterprise27%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business7%
    Midsize Enterprise63%
    Large Enterprise30%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint
    January 2023
    Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint and other solutions. Updated: January 2023.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews. Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, Symphony, Loom, Chatter and Huddle, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Objective ECM. See our Microsoft Teams vs. SharePoint report.

    We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.