We performed a comparison between Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management and SOTI MobiControl based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, JAMF, VMware and others in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM)."If you need only to load a specific profile and you don't have deep security functionalities, et cetera, Intune is very nice and good."
"The Asset Management and Auto Pilot are valuable features."
"Intune's feature that I have found most valuable is its auto-pilot feature."
"It provides control over all mobile devices that are being connected to the corporate network."
"There has been a noticeable increase in productivity for both my organization and clients."
"Intune is effective because of the configuration management and endpoint security it provides. The graphical interface makes it easier to configure and deploy devices."
"Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge."
"It is a very stable and scalable cloud-only solution."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management offers on-premises deployment."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the ability to assign a package to a user on a system If you have your software packages set up via SCCM. It automates the process, which is very convenient, especially since most of our people are remote. Additionally, the overall functionality is good."
"I've really enjoyed the use of the file sync when I'm administrating version control in my program."
"One of the most valuable features is the ability to deploy apps on the fly. We're able to update and deploy new applications, directly from the cloud. That's been a huge feature for us. Instead of putting hands on each of these devices - and we're talking thousands of devices - we can manage it all from the backend."
"The product provides us with information about the incidents. It helped us block specific devices remotely."
"The most valuable features of SOTI MobiControl include location tracking, geofencing, remote device control, and SOTI self-service mobile browsers."
"I have experience with technical support. They are quite good. Also, they very quickly understand the issues and what are the requirements from my side. Response time is also good."
"We use SOTI MobiControl for managing Android device management."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The remote control technology and screen-sharing absolutely help us resolve issues faster. If there is a remote user who has difficulties or does not understand an error or a problem or a crash, the support team can remote control the phone and see right away what is on the screen and act on the problem. We can debug, we can help, we can reboot the phone."
"The UI also needs improvements because it is complex for end-users. We have had feedback from a few users in our organization who found the UI is not feasible for tracking and analyzing all the processes and monitoring all the devices."
"I'm still playing around with it and haven't had any issues with the product yet, but support can definitely be improved."
"It needs incorporation of Knox, ZeroTouch, etc."
"The mobile and tablet-based versions need improvement because they are not completely user-friendly, compared to the web version. Also, data synchronization with our existing asset manager, the synchronization between multiple assets and multiple devices, takes a lot of time due to the security scanning. It should be reduced."
"The solution could improve its flexibility."
"The synchronization could be improved."
"China blocks Google and Google Play Store, which makes installation challenging. Microsoft Intune is a company software, which has to be installed to the app portal or Microsoft Software Center."
"Technical support is not that great."
"In terms of integration, there is still room for improvement in Matrix42."
"Matrix42 Enterprise Mobility Management could improve the user interface, it is not very intuitive."
"I would like to see some SMS integration so people can send data directly from a mobile phone through SMS when there's no internet."
"Maybe if there were tiers, it would be better as then companies could lower the pricing by going to the lower deployment model."
"I would like them to improve the process of enrolling Android devices. It's much more difficult to enroll Android devices than it is Windows CE devices. There are a lot more steps required."
"The documentation could be improved in SOTI MobiControl."
"The solution could use better reporting."
"There is room for improvement when it comes to the ability to customize devices and choosing what information goes onto them."
"I have used Microsoft Intune but it is more complicated than SOTI MobiControl."
"I wish that I had some more tutorials and educational resources on how to use the product."
More Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is ranked 12th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 2 reviews while SOTI MobiControl is ranked 5th in Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) with 46 reviews. Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is rated 8.6, while SOTI MobiControl is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management writes "It is a complete and competitive solution with excellent OEM support". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SOTI MobiControl writes "Provides enterprise mobility and remote control mobile device management". Matrix42 Unified Endpoint Management is most compared with Ivanti Neurons for MDM and ManageEngine Endpoint Central, whereas SOTI MobiControl is most compared with VMware Workspace ONE, 42Gears SureMDM, Jamf Pro, IBM MaaS360 and ManageEngine Endpoint Central.
See our list of best Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Mobility Management (EMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
