We performed a comparison between N-able EDR and Trend Vision One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)."The ease of deployment and configuration is valuable. It's very easy compared to other vendors like Sophos. Sophos' configuration is complex. Fortinet is a lot easier to understand. You don't need a lot of admin knowledge to do the configuration."
"I like FortiClient EMS. FortiEDR has a lot of great features like lockdown mode, remote wipes, and encryption. I can set malware outbreak policies and controls for detecting abnormalities. You can also simulate phishing attacks."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"Fortinet FortiEDR made our clients feel secure and more at ease, knowing that they had an EDR solution that would close the gap in their security posture."
"I get alerts when scripts are detected in the environment."
"The product detects and blocks threats and is more proactive than firewalls."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"Fortinet has helped free up around 20 percent of our staff's time to help us out."
"The most valuable features are the rollback feature, it's important for us. The AI models and are good."
"I like that it is a comprehensive security solution with a lot of features. You can say XDR is an end-to-end security solution with endpoint security. It includes all your servers, networks, and other devices. The endpoint security solution does not cover this. Plus, machine learning and features like that are the main things in XDR solutions."
"Trend Micro XDR is a comprehensive solution that is not overly complex to use or manage."
"It helps a lot to understand where the threat is coming from, where is it going, how is it being dealt with, et cetera."
"For scalability, I would give a rating of ten out of ten."
"The most valuable feature is the network protection shield on every server, which isolates attacks and prevents our clients from being affected."
"The solution is stable."
"I can prevent my environment from different types of attacks based on what I see in the Vision One console."
"We can scale the product as needed."
"The security should be strong for the cloud. Some applications are on-prem and some are on the cloud. Fortinet should also have strong security for the cloud. There should be more security for the cloud."
"Once, we had an event that was locked and blocked, but information about it came to us two or three days later."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"Cannot be used on mobile devices with a secure connection."
"I haven't seen the use of AI in the solution."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"Intelligence aspects need improvement"
"FortiEDR could add a separate scanning dashboard. In incident management, we prefer to remove the endpoint system from the environment and scan the system. We typically use Symantec for that, but if we want to use FortiEDR for that, then we need a scanning tab to clarify things."
"We have a lot of false positives we see in the dashboard. I think this is the only problem we are facing."
"The zero trust is a bit complicated compared to other parts of the solution."
"The solution lacks compatibility with other products. It needs to integrate better with other surrounding solutions."
"I would like to have more integration with mobile device management."
"The integration with third-party tools and with on-premises Active Directory needs improvement."
"The agent system is very slow, it needs to improve its performance."
"We'd like to see a few more integrations."
"We do use the automation capability a little. However, we noticed some limitations, especially on the playbook side."
"A room for improvement is Trend Micro XDR's website. It's a very complicated website since finding the right point one wants to see is difficult."
Earn 20 points
N-able EDR is ranked 56th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) while Trend Vision One is ranked 5th in Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) with 43 reviews. N-able EDR is rated 0.0, while Trend Vision One is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of N-able EDR writes "Stable, effective rollback feature, and useful AI models". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trend Vision One writes "The integration of toolsets is key, enabling automation, and vendor has been tremendous partner for us". N-able EDR is most compared with SentinelOne Singularity Complete, CrowdStrike Falcon, Elastic Security and Check Point Harmony Endpoint, whereas Trend Vision One is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security, Microsoft Defender XDR, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks.
See our list of best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors and best Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vendors.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.