We performed a comparison between NetSuite OneWorld and SAP S/4HANA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two ERP solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Allows us to use it the way we need to instead of changing our needs and processes to fit the product."
"The ability to customize it to create custom fields that are reportable, and then to be able to write script behind it to automate other processes that might otherwise be manual is great."
"The solution is scalable."
"NetSuite OneWorld is a single instance that allows you to do different business functions, such as reporting, order-to-cash, design-build, and procure-to-pay. This feature is what's most valuable in the solution."
"We've set up Jira integration and used robotic process automation (RPA) to streamline various processes, like procurement and invoicing. Some processes still require manual approval, like supplier invoices, but we're simplifying those too. We're also exploring integrating with other tools like Power BI for better data analytics and reporting. Currently, our automation focuses on general tasks, not document understanding or anything complex like that."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"The solution is user-friendly and flexible."
"Utilizes best practices that are simple to implement."
"The most valuable feature is the detail in all of the processes. The solution captures our policies and enables us to implement our policies in SAP. There are different models that address our needs."
"S4HANA is very scalable - we use it across seven or eight factories, and everything is running fine."
"The processes have been reduced from almost 10 steps to four or five steps. It's really been simplified."
"From a technology standpoint, the theory and analytics are fascinating."
"It is a very scalable solution. We have enterprise-level businesses using this solution."
"The in-memory processing capability is most valuable."
"Responsive, comprehensive and optimized solution."
"The Fiori design is a valuable feature."
"The solution could improve by having more integration."
"Needs time entry for billable employees."
"NetSuite OneWorld, the consolidation feature has been incredibly valuable. However, I cannot speak to the full range of features and functionalities offered by OneWorld as I am not familiar with all of them. I have utilized OneWorld primarily in the biotech industry, with a focus on operating expenses and financial reporting, such as capital contributions and foreign currency adjustments. I am confident, however, that OneWorld offers a robust module for reporting and consolidating revenue, though I have not had the opportunity to directly utilize this aspect of the software."
"Currently, NetSuite OneWorld needs to be more mature, especially compared to SAP."
"If you were to use standard costs, it doesn't handle standard costs well."
"I hope NetSuite OneWorld introduces features like support for different pricing models, including packaging options, and improved production planning tools in the future."
"Some entities are not available for multiple subsidiaries, which requires duplication."
"I don’t like the SaaS models. Of course, they make the tool powerful enough to run a billion-dollar business. The tool is cheaper than SAP or Core."
"Their yearly licensing is expensive. Improvements are needed on the user experience level and digital work."
"This is a costly solution."
"The solution could have a better user experience. However, they are working a lot on the user experience and they have come up with various applications, such as mobile applications. This was lacking over the last two years."
"Every year, when a new version is released, it comes with a very thick booklet of 300 or 400 pages and it is a little difficult to comprehend."
"In a feature release, they could improve by adding budgetary features."
"Documentation could be improved."
"The install can be difficult. There's something called secondary sales solutions that is not there in SAP. We need to have third-party tools to integrate to do the automatization. The two parts are missing on the secondary sales solution and automation."
"Thi solution can improve the Bill of Materials (BOM) and production planning."
NetSuite OneWorld is ranked 14th in ERP with 14 reviews while SAP S/4HANA is ranked 2nd in ERP with 65 reviews. NetSuite OneWorld is rated 8.4, while SAP S/4HANA is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of NetSuite OneWorld writes "Customizable with great integration capabilities and very good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP S/4HANA writes "The solution is highly scalable, with solid performance and integration". NetSuite OneWorld is most compared with NetSuite ERP, SAP Business One, JD Edwards EnterpriseOne and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas SAP S/4HANA is most compared with SAP ERP, SAP Business One, Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central and Oracle E-Business Suite. See our NetSuite OneWorld vs. SAP S/4HANA report.
See our list of best ERP vendors.
We monitor all ERP reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.