We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and ProcessMaker based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is very easy to use events. K2 has useful tools."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It can scale well."
"This tool set makes it easy to integrate current processes and increase adoption rates and usage for the tool, as well as the process changes to update it on the fly."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."
"Its performance, stability, and security are fine."
"What I like most is the seamlessness of the workflow capabilities."
"The security features for this solution need to be improved."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"We cannot use the same solution on cloud."
"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."
"I would also like to see the BPM features from Pega implemented, that have to do with the implementation of AI, and the robotics."
"This solution only supports basic text, but we would like to be able to insert components such as rich text, graphs, charts, pictures, and other objects."
"Its interface should be a bit more user-friendly."
Earn 20 points
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while ProcessMaker is ranked 37th in Business Process Management (BPM). Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while ProcessMaker is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ProcessMaker writes "Easy to learn, automates our manual processes to make things easier, and saves us time and money". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas ProcessMaker is most compared with Camunda, Apache Airflow, Bonita and Appian. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. ProcessMaker report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
