We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"With an extensive list of integrations with LOB data, your workflows can extend far beyond SharePoint, driving adoption of SharePoint."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"The Vizio-style designer that runs in the browser is, to me, by far the most valuable feature of the solution. It means that the customer doesn’t have to install any client tools to create powerful workflows."
"It saves time as tasks are automated."
"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."
"The integration capabilities have been very useful."
"It can scale well."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."
"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"The GUI is very easy to use, where you can sit together with your colleagues, discuss the process, and during these discussions you can build up the model."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"The most valuable feature for me is the collaboration point of view, where everybody has a single view, or source of truth, and everybody sees the same thing. Everyone can comment, contribute, and discuss the processes itself, which makes it easier to funnel down the most value adding comments and make the relevant changes to the processes. This leads to the next best iteration or version of your process."
"I love the collaboration function, especially the option to invite people who don't have any users on the licenses."
"The management server and the admin page where you can manage processes need improvement."
"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"It's very tedious to manage."
"Converting a document from PDF to MS Word, or vice versa, needs to be improved."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."
"The user management functionality in Process Manager is not as user friendly as the one in the Collaboration Hub."
"I would like to be able to link a single word within a textual description directly to the glossary."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
"Moreover, the functionality to show different process variations with "views" could be improved to allow more customization of these views. I believe this would increase the user experience and administrative efforts maintaining these process variations."
"The solution is complex."
"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Microsoft Dynamics CRM, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
