SharePoint vs Slack comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
7,894 views|6,463 comparisons
77% willing to recommend
Slack Logo
2,578 views|1,112 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SharePoint and Slack based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed SharePoint vs. Slack Report (Updated: March 2020).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform.""SharePoint has made things easier with the increased functionality for building the portals, microsites, and total integration with Microsoft categories.""OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information.""Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS.""It offers ease of use, which is crucial.""It has helped us with storing all the documents, which means that people are not going to intervene. There is a way of extracting knowledge within documentation and tracking it. There are knowledge assets for where documentation is stored, indexed and searchable through SharePoint.""SharePoint has an option where you can open files on the browser, whereby more than five people can make amendments to one Excel online file.""There is not just one valuable feature; it is all of them working together."

More SharePoint Pros →

"The most valuable features are video conferencing and sharing content during meetings.""I like Slack's notifications. It is more user-friendly and pleasing than Teams.""The product makes communication seamless.""I use Slack for communication with my colleagues.""It allows to facilitate communication, allowing us to create channels for updates, file sharing, and photo sharing within our team profiles.""With respect to being a clean and efficient communications platform, I think that it does the job quite well.""The solution is scalable.""Slack helps me to read bulk messages."

More Slack Pros →

Cons
"We do sell Hyland OnBase, which is probably a competitor to SharePoint and does a lot more. In our own organization, we haven't had a need for it, but certainly, for our customers, we are finding that to be a better fit. In terms of the technical reasons for that, I'm not involved much on that side, so I can't give specifics, but there is certainly room for them to improve or add on certain features that clearly are not available in SharePoint, but they are available in Hyland OnBase.""Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA.""The solution lacks collaboration features.""We would like more security features, like automating.""More hints and make it more user-customizable.""No good process to import emails from several users into a single comprehensive SP repository.""SharePoint’s scalability could be improved.""Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."

More SharePoint Cons →

"The solution should have less frequent updates.""Customization is something that Slack is lacking.""The way groups are created on slack could be improved. Once you create a group of people, you can't add additional people unless you convert it to a channel.""The tool is a bit slow.""Slack is not as strong as competitors like Teams when it comes to things like video meetings and audio meetings.""Slack could add additional and better integrations.""There could be a read function so that when you send a message, instead of the other person having to add a reaction, you know that the message went through.""I would like the in-meeting content sharing facility to be improved."

More Slack Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "As usual, Microsoft’s licensing structures don’t really seem to fit the needs of their products. This leads to always paying for a project you will never use fully or always be adding to."
  • "Licensing can be by server or by seat."
  • "It is very expensive.​"
  • "The data classification and search elements are cheap."
  • "The replacement costs for it are cheaper if you use only SharePoint."
  • "We have purchased add-ons to handle multiple site collections, form creation, and design."
  • "The cost is expensive, but worthwhile."
  • "The pricing works for us."
  • More SharePoint Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We use the free version that does not have a license."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "It is less expensive than one of its competitors."
  • "It is an expensive tool. We pay 15 to 20 USD monthly per user."
  • "Slack is definitely worth the money."
  • "The pricing can range up to about twenty bucks a user. You can spend a lot of money, especially if you're talking about thousands of users. Generally speaking, Slack is less expensive than Teams. Slack doesn't include all the bells and whistles that Teams does. So you can go from a $6 license in Microsoft 365 to a $50 license per user per month, and there's a lot more you can do in the $50 license."
  • "I would rate the tool's pricing a four out of ten."
  • "The solution is cheap in my country."
  • More Slack Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparison Review
    Anonymous User
    At Mediacurrent we often get requests to compare Drupal to other platforms used for intranet sites and social business platforms (like https://dev.twitter.com/ for example). This is often referred to as “Social Business Software”, which has grown in popularity in recent years. I decided to do a round-up of a couple of the more well known platforms and compare their products to Drupal. In this roundup we will be comparing Jive, Sharepoint and Drupal Commons. Drupal Commons is a popular distribution created by Acquia to compete with some of these other proprietary platforms. There are many other options out there, commercial and otherwise, to compare with Drupal but I want to focus on Jive and Sharepoint for a couple of reasons. I chose Jive because it is one of the leading competitors in this space in respect to market share. Next, I chose Sharepoint because I have some history with Sharepoint. This experience dates back to when I built www.adhe.edu with Sharepoint 2007 a few years ago. I subsequently wrote this blog entry about my experience shortly after joining Mediacurrent. This roundup will also act as a refresher for those who read my original “Drupal vs. Sharepoint” blog. Yammer, which was recently bought by Microsoft and is the tool we currently use for office communication will also get some mentions throughout this article. As I went through and tested each of these tools I used three main criteria in my evaluation Cost Ability to Customize Overall features… Read more →
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Alfresco scores are high on all features of an ECM solution and tools.   Back office processing, rated as 3.36 good.  Business Process Application 3.55 Good to excellent.  Document Management 4.12… more »
    Top Answer:The pricing is competitive. That's why almost all the companies are using SharePoint. I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. When we buy the license, the person buying must be well-educated on how the… more »
    Top Answer:Nowadays, we don't need to visit an HR portal. Our marketing and human resources teams directly share details about birthdays, upcoming events, and important dates in Slack. Whether it's a training… more »
    Top Answer:We could see improvement in Slack by having an integrated meeting tool. Currently, we rely on third-party integration tools like Zoom to schedule meetings. It would be much more convenient to schedule… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    7,894
    Comparisons
    6,463
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    562
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    2,578
    Comparisons
    1,112
    Reviews
    34
    Average Words per Review
    354
    Rating
    8.4
    Comparisons
    Citrix ShareFile logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Dropbox logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Box logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    WordPress logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Symphony logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Atlassian Confluence logo
    Compared 15% of the time.
    Chatter logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    ChatWork logo
    Compared 12% of the time.
    Zulip logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Also Known As
    SharePoint 2007, SharePoint 2010
    Learn More
    Overview

    SharePoint is a Microsoft-based platform for building web applications. It covers a widerange of capabilities and while it is appropriate for experienced webdevelopers, even non-technical minded users can easily navigate through thesystem and execute functions such as collaborating data, managing documents andfiles, creating websites, managing social networking solutions, and automatingworkflow.

    Major areas that SharePoint deals with are websites,communities, content, search, insights, and composites. The purpose is to give usersthe ability to create or develop these key business components on their owneven without technical knowledge of, for example, how to build a website or howto integrate coding. Configuring SharePoint into a business's system is meantto cut out all of the complicated steps, and pave the way for easierimplementation all around.

    Slack is where work happens. It’s a digital workspace that powers your organization — all the pieces and the people — so you can get things done.

    Slack brings all your communication together in one place. It's real-time messaging, archiving and search for modern teams.

    Sample Customers
    Toyota, Aeroports de Paris, ASBBank Ltd., Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals, CambridgeshireConstabulary, D&M Group, NPL Construction Company, and The Regional Municipality of Niagara.
    Strava, The New York Times, Spotify, Blue Bottle Coffee Company, Eventbrite, Box, Circa, Stripe
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Energy/Utilities Company8%
    University8%
    Comms Service Provider8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government12%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company24%
    Marketing Services Firm13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization82%
    Computer Software Company4%
    Financial Services Firm3%
    University1%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise20%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise60%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business63%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise24%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business5%
    Midsize Enterprise83%
    Large Enterprise12%
    Buyer's Guide
    SharePoint vs. Slack
    March 2020
    Find out what your peers are saying about SharePoint vs. Slack and other solutions. Updated: March 2020.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    SharePoint is ranked 1st in Enterprise Content Management with 146 reviews while Slack is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Social Software with 68 reviews. SharePoint is rated 7.8, while Slack is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Slack writes "A competitive solution that improves collaboration and productivity". SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and WordPress, whereas Slack is most compared with Symphony, Atlassian Confluence, Chatter, ChatWork and Zulip. See our SharePoint vs. Slack report.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.