We performed a comparison between Apache Airflow and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We're running it on a virtual server, which we can easily upgrade if needed."
"The solution's UI allows me to collect all the information and see the code lines."
"I like the UI rework, it's much easier."
"This is a simple tool to automate using Python."
"Since it's widely adopted by the community, Apache Airflow is a user-friendly solution."
"Since the solution is programmatic, it allows users to define pipelines in code rather than drag and drop."
"Every feature in Apache Airflow is valuable. The number of operators and features I've used are mainly related to connectivity services and integrated services because I primarily work with GCP."
"Apache Airflow is in Python language, making it easy to use and learn."
"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."
"I like the collaboration and the real-time aspects of it."
"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"I use SAP Signavio Process Manager to model processes to the former operating model."
"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."
"We can use workflow manager to create forms."
"The feature that I like the most is the collaboration hub, where every user or every employee can see the process in the overview."
"Apache Airflow should have better integration with cloud platforms."
"There is an area for improvement in onboarding new people. They should make it simple for newcomers. Else, we have to put a senior engineer to operate it."
"I would like to see some no-code capabilities and drag and drop abilities in Airflow."
"Airflow should support the dynamic drag creation."
"The scalability of the solution itself is not as we expected. Being on the cloud, it should be easy to scale, however, it's not."
"I have some issues with the solution's communication."
"For admins, there should be improved logging capabilities because Apache Airflow does have logging, but it's limited to some database data."
"Apache Airflow could be improved by integrating some versioning principles."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"There are a few bugs when you use the Microsoft Surface Hub with the big screen."
"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."
"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."
"I would like to see more integration with the process manager in terms of the workflow accelerator."
"If you start from scratch then I think this product would be ideal, but if you already have something then it may or may not suit you."
Apache Airflow is ranked 2nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 31 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. Apache Airflow is rated 8.0, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Apache Airflow writes "Enable seamless integration with various connectivity and integrated services, including BigQuery and Python operators ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Apache Airflow is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Informatica Cloud API and App Integration, IBM Business Automation Workflow and AWS Step Functions, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our Apache Airflow vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.