We performed a comparison between Blue Prism Cloud and SAP Intelligent RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Once it does the monitor, it collects the respective data and creates an output that is required for reconfiguration."
"It's easy to use, the interface, the the the the queries is which we use. It's user friendly."
"It is more secure for complex implementations."
"Decipher has been a valuable feature that many of our clients use to extract information from documents."
"The solution is very complete. It's a good solution, for the kind of features that they offer."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"The solution works well overall."
"Blue Prism is well known for being used in banking and security organizations. Its security is superior compared to UiPath and other RPA tools."
"The initial setup of SAP Contextor is easy."
"Most of the details are already in the help portal and SAP notes are available. It is well documented as part of the product support."
"Contextor is a good solution for a Citrix environment. It's the first with this tool. Other tools provide the same functionality, but not with the Citrix environment."
"It is remarkably easy to configure and code, and it doesn't require an extensive technical background or coding expertise."
"The standout features of SAP Intelligent RPA are its flexibility and integration capabilities."
"The most valuable feature of SAP Contextor is that everyone is in one place in the program that I need."
"Scalability is fine. It is pretty nice."
"It could be more flexible."
"The pricing was a bit high, from what I understand. That might have played a role in the decision to migrate to another solution."
"It would be useful if some of the information protocols came built within the app instead having to create them."
"The solution is unable to read some UI components in legacy systems."
"We have limited integrations in place, and my objective is to integrate Sentinel. However, there are constraints as some individuals have only one or two options for SIM integration solutions. Given the urgency of quick resolutions in today's landscape, prevention and detection are crucial. While these measures provide significant security, it's equally important to focus on response and recovery. In the case of a ransomware attack, it's not enough to solely prevent and detect. Once detection is in place, a response model should be implemented to automate the process and minimize the time required for tasks, such as creating investigation reports. In the past, it would take approximately seven to eight days to create an investigation report for a specific attack, including writing a case study. This process can be streamlined and improved through the automation of contextual investigation reports. By saving base templates and content, including screenshots and attack details, automation can be achieved. We are currently working on integrating Microsoft WAF and Excel for this purpose, but having a built-in tool would be ideal."
"Improvement should be per customer requirements."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"Blue Prism could be more efficient in its resource use. Having one LPR agent per virtual machine wastes resources. If we could execute many applications at the same time, it would improve and optimize the resource used."
"There should be more of an error, like a proper error feature, in future releases. Sometimes, we don't understand why that automation is not learning what, like, where it is stuck, or what is the reason like, or what is the criteria we are missing to add. So a proper error message would be helpful."
"SAP Contextor could improve by automating some processes."
"The initial setup is of medium complexity. It is neither too hard nor too simple. You need some background in SAP and an understanding of it."
"I found that the SAP scripting of a program is easier than SAP Contextor."
"One way SAP Intelligent RPA could improve is by integrating built-in DI services for document processing."
"I would like to see a better capacity for unstructured data, for example, PDF, or text within images."
"For potential features or improvements, one aspect I would suggest enhancing is the flexibility of the extraction process."
Blue Prism Cloud is ranked 7th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 38 reviews while SAP Intelligent RPA is ranked 17th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 7 reviews. Blue Prism Cloud is rated 8.0, while SAP Intelligent RPA is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Blue Prism Cloud writes "It helps us save on staff costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Intelligent RPA writes "Enhanced streamlining and optimization of the business processes with reduced operational costs, improved data accuracy, and increased overall productivity". Blue Prism Cloud is most compared with Blue Prism, Microsoft Power Automate, UiPath, Robocorp and Redwood Software - Finance Automation Edition, whereas SAP Intelligent RPA is most compared with UiPath, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Blue Prism. See our Blue Prism Cloud vs. SAP Intelligent RPA report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
