We performed a comparison between Broadcom Clarity and monday.com based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Project Management Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."We just put all the data into one place and hopefully, after we have accurate data, we can make more decisions based on real data rather than gut feeling."
"I love the fact that it is very flexible. I am the lead engineer with enhancements, development, developing new portlets, anything that has to be added on, and integrating data, such as ETL processing."
"Being able to track all of the projects with all of the details of those projects, and being able to move projects along from a process perspective, that is really beneficial."
"We are able to track budgets, and with timesheets, actuals against budgets."
"Transparency and just having the ability to procure information that is pertinent."
"Broadcom Clarity PPM's most valuable feature is the plenty of modules, such as portfolio, project, resource, and time."
"We have flexible scrum teams, developers that will serve on one scrum team for a few sprints or for a project. Being able to track where people go with the resource management features, and making sure that our teams are fully staffed, is important."
"The feature that I have found most valuable is the XFlow, that interface is pretty cool."
"Monday.com is a very organized and easy-to-use tool."
"The coolest thing is the way the files or documents can be uploaded to subitems."
"The initial setup is easy."
"Shareable boards are a great solution for clients who want to track the progress of their work orders without checking in with us directly."
"I especially like the dashboards where you can combine info from different boards into one."
"The solution provides a one-stop place for notes, progress, and sharing the status of projects."
"Has very good collaborative functions."
"The possibility of having multiple boards is indeed a great feature that allows us to see the many projects (and their progress) at a glance."
"There are some tool limitations. We had to create some of our own summary competencies to create more of an agile tool concept, or an agile team concept, that they did not really have."
"One of the areas that we would improve upon is not necessarily with the tool, but having more tips/tricks on adoption. How to get people outside of the PMO to use the tool and get the information."
"I would like to see more team-based management, and less people-based management; as far as the resource management goes, to do it per team and not per person."
"I want to see integration for SMS functionality."
"The solution could improve the way the workflow is developed. I think they could be more dynamic because they are in a way static. They're very powerful, but they don't have any interaction with end-users."
"Financials are okay, but there's a lot of room for improvement in financials.Financial plans, if those could be made so that you're not always grouping your financial data by predefined attributes, that would be helpful for us."
"The forms (e.g., project properties page) need to be more attractive, colorful, and field more flexibility for validations."
"It would be good for them to work on the user interface to make it more interactive."
"While I appreciate the templates, some of them are extremely complex and not as tailored to non-profit work so they required quite a bit of customizing (but worth the trouble)."
"What would be nice is if I had two days between deadlines and adjusted the day if it would automatically adjust the deadlines, even if I had to change one or two that might no longer work, it would save a lot of steps."
"The key limitation I face is that I don't find the tool to be fully intuitive as more time is required for me to learn how to use it optimally."
"The calendar selection for dates is not the easiest to navigate."
"The data linkage could be improved. For example, sometimes you cannot automate item creation when you link different items to each other. You cannot connect the data deeply from field to field. It's somewhat complicated to link a contact to some account fields and automate the contact's behavior based on the value of those fields. The data is sometimes not structured enough for deep processing."
"We'd love the ability to be able to build and export reports based on multiple boards."
"The mobile application of the solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly."
"They need to add more data values and fields, such as currency and functional fields, as well as more trigger functionality for automation and time-based management."
Broadcom Clarity is ranked 7th in Project Management Software with 136 reviews while monday.com is ranked 1st in Project Management Software with 222 reviews. Broadcom Clarity is rated 8.0, while monday.com is rated 9.4. The top reviewer of Broadcom Clarity writes "A dynamic solution with a lot of great out-of-the-box calculations, but integration with reporting utilities is a bit painful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of monday.com writes "We can collaborate with our customers efficiently and professionally, and automation makes it easy for everyone". Broadcom Clarity is most compared with Microsoft Project, Jira, ServiceNow Strategic Portfolio Management, Planview Portfolios and JIRA Portfolio, whereas monday.com is most compared with Wrike, Asana, Microsoft Dynamics CRM, Zoho CRM and Freshservice. See our Broadcom Clarity vs. monday.com report.
See our list of best Project Management Software vendors, best Project Portfolio Management vendors, and best Project Portfolio Management vendors.
We monitor all Project Management Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
