We performed a comparison between Imanami GroupID and SailPoint IdentityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two User Provisioning Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Imanami GroupID's UI is good."
"For each job code, we go through and determine the access they're supposed to have to the system. Based on that job code, we use the query tool and say that anybody who is in this job code gets these groups added to them, or conversely, if they change job codes, it removes the ones that they shouldn't have and adds the one they should. That runs every night, and the next day, everybody has the job codes they're supposed to have."
"I have found the overall features to be useful."
"The tool is quite stable and user-friendly."
"The most valuable features of SailPoint IdentityIQ are the reporting because it is better than other solutions. The workflows can be customized to our requirements and the overall features are good."
"Provides functionalities for various stages, such as joiner, mover, and leaver"
"I find the built-in connectors, lifecycle management, certification, and recertification features to be the most valuable."
"Good life cycle management, segregation of duties, and analytics features."
"Provides good authorization and authentication system functionality."
"Provisioning in multiple environments."
"The first valuable feature of the solution is its interface. The second feature of the solution is the level of flexibility it provides."
"The mobile application needs to be improved and there should be chatbox features to allow users to easily reach out for assistance."
"I'd like to see a better user interface. It works, but it is clunky. There should be better import and export of LDAP queries and better management tools."
"The product's implementation is complex. It should also work on GPO."
"There are various functions that don't work in IdentityIQ, including the access request reminder, which doesn't go to the approvals in the proper format, so it's hard for users to read."
"The UI is complex."
"Scalability is hard, especially when you are doing it in real time."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ needs to improve its customization. It should also incorporate some standardized tools for implementation."
"It tends to be more expensive, but at the end of the day, it works."
"Finding integration experts for SailPoint in the North American market can be challenging, and transitioning to a no-code or low-code setup could reduce dependence on specialized skills."
"They should lower the price and technical support should be better."
"SailPoint IdentityIQ could be cheaper."
Imanami GroupID is ranked 10th in User Provisioning Software with 3 reviews while SailPoint IdentityIQ is ranked 1st in User Provisioning Software with 61 reviews. Imanami GroupID is rated 8.4, while SailPoint IdentityIQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Imanami GroupID writes "Simplifies the task of managing groups and is affordable and easy to implement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SailPoint IdentityIQ writes "Flexible, easy to customize, and not too difficult to set up". Imanami GroupID is most compared with Netwrix Auditor and ManageEngine ADManager Plus, whereas SailPoint IdentityIQ is most compared with Saviynt, One Identity Manager, Microsoft Entra ID, ForgeRock and Microsoft Identity Manager. See our Imanami GroupID vs. SailPoint IdentityIQ report.
See our list of best User Provisioning Software vendors and best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all User Provisioning Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.