We performed a comparison between OpenText 360 for SharePoint and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"I have done a lot of modeling over quite a number of years, and I think that the modeling capabilities in Signavio are state of the art."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."
"The product's most valuable feature is the transformation process."
"The solution provides data mining and AI features."
"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"Its licensing needs to be simplified. Currently, its licensing is very complex. It contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify the licensing and make it easier to understand. It would make a customer's life easier."
"They need to come with more out of the box solutions, rather than depending on customers to develop them."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."
"The solution is complex."
"Its reporting feature could have customization options."
"The product's pricing could be improved."
"It is not easy to learn the product."
"There is room for improvement in the reporting function. At the moment, for example, while it is possible to report on how many users you had in the last month, you can't use it to tell you how many users you had from the first week to the second week. This is really a drawback because when you have an activity to promote Signavio or BPI, it would be good to be able to measure how many people you had in the system."
"It could use a better user interface, one that is more efficient."
"Signavio Process Manager needs to have an integrated document management system to better work with processes that rely heavily on documents and document flows."
OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and ADONIS. See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
