We compared BMC Remedy and ServiceNow across several parameters based on our users' reviews. After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below:
Comparison Results: BMC Remedy is commended for its user-friendly interface, valuable features, and impressive dashboards and reports. However, it could benefit from more intuitive dashboards and improved system stability. On the other hand, ServiceNow is highly efficient in workflow management, offers scalability, and provides customization options. Nevertheless, it could enhance the implementation of features and improve its user interface. Both products are considered expensive in terms of pricing and licensing, but ServiceNow is viewed as more reasonable for large organizations. Customer service and support for both products have received mixed feedback, with some finding it helpful and others suggesting room for improvement.
"It's a scalable product."
"It's an exceptionally robust and seamlessly integrated solution that has greatly facilitated our operations."
"The solution offers some very good features."
"This product is good because it allows us to receive proper responses to business emails anywhere and anytime. It helps in effective communication with employees. The solution is stable. The product is scalable. The initial setup is straightforward. I recommend BMC Remedy, especially for its automation capabilities."
"The incident management console is available out of the box."
"The solution helps us manage, escalate, and solve incidents."
"The most valuable feature of the solution includes all of its components since they act as the authentication system of the product."
"There are a lot of features a customer can use. It’s an existing concept of asset management. One feature is the ability to create tickets for various computer systems, VPN defenses, sites, regions, or customers."
"I find almost all the features valuable. It can do nearly everything except make your coffee, as my colleagues always say. It's got pros and cons, like every software, but the good thing about it is that it has a very structured approach."
"I prefer ServiceNow to the competition because of its ease of use, installation and configuration."
"We used ServiceNow for change management, release management, and event management."
"I like ServiceNow's Workspace feature. With Jira, we had to edit a ticket by going into it. We couldn't perform edits from within the project plan. ServiceNow allows you to edit everything from one screen. It's like an Excel spreadsheet, but Jira requires you to drill down into the ticket. ServiceNow is more convenient if you are working on multiple projects and workflows."
"We have found the service easy to use, although, we have ended up customising a lot of parameters."
"The workflow makes things extremely efficient and it improves effectiveness."
"For change management, I find the CAB workbench very useful. I haven't seen any other solution that has a CAB workbench or advanced automated solutions for a change advisory board. ServiceNow also has the Workflow Engine which works very well and is very intuitive."
"It offers enhanced and efficient communication between the requester and the four pillar EDR through an online chat platform."
"BMC Remedy's change management module needs enhancement."
"The tool is very old."
"The product's scalability is one area with certain shortcomings that need to be considered for improvement."
"There are issues from a product functionality perspective."
"One area that requires improvement is the prevention of duplicates or data inconsistencies in the system."
"However, from a stability perspective, we sometimes had issues, like running out of resources, maxing out, database issues, and the server freezing out and functioning at fifty percent."
"The UI is quite outdated."
"Continuous improvement is recommended."
"I would like to see Advanced Intelligent Automation."
"Local solutions have lower costs."
"Once a change request has been created once it's been approved and been submitted, there is no way to go in on that particular change request and submit an additional task."
"It's too complicated and there are too many options."
"We find it good in general. Obviously, there are areas of improvement for every capability. As they evolve more, if they keep on adding more intelligence into the capabilities, it will improve. The improvement areas are more integration across the landscape and more intelligence for the overall capability of the solution."
"I would like to see a mobile version of ServiceNow."
"There are Virtual Task Boards in the tool in the latest releases. There are many of them in the Scaled Agile Framework. There is some room there for improvement. It's really quite promising but, at the same time, it could be improved and I believe it will be improved soon."
"The interface is not user-friendly."
BMC Remedy is ranked 5th in IT Asset Management with 23 reviews while ServiceNow is ranked 1st in IT Asset Management with 212 reviews. BMC Remedy is rated 8.0, while ServiceNow is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of BMC Remedy writes "Offers automation, orchestration, service level management but lacks AI-based rules ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow writes "A stable and scalable solution that has excellent features and is useful for collecting data and building KPIs". BMC Remedy is most compared with BMC Helix Discovery, Snow License Manager, Qualys VMDR, ManageEngine IT Asset Management and BMC Track-It!, whereas ServiceNow is most compared with BMC Helix ITSM, Microsoft Power Apps, Pega BPM, IBM Maximo and PagerDuty Operations Cloud. See our BMC Remedy vs. ServiceNow report.
See our list of best IT Asset Management vendors.
We monitor all IT Asset Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
www.quora.com
The article linked above helps people select a help desk software based on the parameters suggested.
You can also try Happyfox, an online centralized ticket management software hosted on the cloud. It has light and clear pricing and leanest learning curve. Please check the set-up steps here. www.happyfox.com
Hult Internation Business school is currently using our help desk software. www.happyfox.com
Happyfox does provide special discounts for education institutions and please contact me for more information.
Hi Lawrence, I think you are opensource guy, so you may check it out
OTRS is an Open source Ticket Request System with many features to manage customer telephone calls and e-mails. It is distributed under the GNU AFFERO General Public License (AGPL) and tested on Linux, Solaris, AIX, Windows, FreeBSD, OpenBSD and Mac OS 10.x. Do you receive many e-mails and want to answer them with a team of agents? You're going to love OTRS!
github.com and try below release
www.otrs.com
1. Which software are you using and how do you find the software? Service Now, very useful. Is it easy to use and customizable? Yes. If so, how can we customize it? Forms, fields are easy to setup; business rules – java scripts, api.
2. What software did you use before the one you are currently using and did it offer a way to import existing tickets from your old system to your current one? CA and BMC. We did not import old tickets into the current systems. We imported assets. Change, Incidents, Request start from fresh. Old data was exported and kept as retention.
3. What about/How does licensing costs/work? Only IT roles are payable. As educational institutions face financial pressures, what are the costs and flexible options for payment? Cloud based subscription – based on usage.
4. Is your software on-premise and cloud/hosted/SaAS models? SAAS
5. Are you using any other of their modules/product offerings? If so, which ones? Catalog, Service Desk – incidents, problem, request, Change, Asset, CMDB, Discovery, KB, SDLC
6. What is it about the software that you like? Easy to use What is it that you dislike? Ease of version upgrades are managed but require testing for many hotfixes, some issues are moved to enhancement request within the platform and needs to move to the next version for resolution. Reporting is not as good for trending etc. However, OOB reports can be easily created with existing views. More scripting solutions should be made available to provide greater functionality.
7. What is it that you like about their company and support? Have timezone support with ease of ticket creation. What is it that you dislike? Some problems moved as next release enhancements; manual creation of MIBS / updates for discovery creation of correct models. No able to detect stack switches out of the box
8. Does your software have asset management (desktop, mobile, app and network), a solutions wiki? a help/chat ticketing system? etc. ITAM yes but has not moved onto SAM. Mobile not captured; workstations, servers, applications, business services, network are captured. Service Now discovery is very good as it is agentless but still need to be tweak to ensure proper creation especially on newer equipment and stack switches.
9. Has anybody used Cherwell? ServiceNow? FrontRange? BMC Track-IT? Service Now
Hi Lawrence. I work at Agiloft, and we use our own Service Desk solution. We have several customers successfully using Agiloft for higher education IT service management, including Texas A&M and Cal Poly.
Agiloft is completely customizable with no coding required - all customization is done using an easy drag-and-drop GUI. It's available as both an on-premise solution and SaaS, and includes modules for Asset Management, Customer Support, Integrated Chat, and more, with no additional per-module cost.
You can learn more at www.agiloft.com, or google "Agiloft reviews" to find plenty of thorough, 5-star reviews of our product, including several from our higher education customers. Hope this helps! Good luck!