We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"I think that it is one of the best products on the market from my experience."
"Many people enjoy its zero learning-curve."
"Confluence can link any ticket or task from JIRA to be included on the Confluence page."
"This is a scalable solution that supports thousands of users."
"The trial stages, the ability to connect it to Jira, and the ability to export in PDF are all good capabilities."
"There is a good library of templates for a wide range of needs."
"The interface is good....I didn't face any issues with the scalability. It was very good."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
"It has good integration with other MS products."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"SharePoint enabled the staff to share documents and work on a document simultaneously."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"Removed the need of paper storage and people flow into the office."
"The ability to quickly and easily create team sites has been great."
"The UX is a little bit all over the place."
"The one way in which this solution could be improved is by offering better design and UI."
"When we have a project that we don't want to share with everybody but want people to know that it exists, there is no way to do this in Confluence. When a project is not shared, people cannot see that it exits."
"The cost of the solution is too high."
"Managing user permissions and credentials could be easier."
"Space maintenance could be made a little more user-friendly."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"It would be interesting if they had graphical templates that allowed typical agile ceremonies to be documented better."
"The product must provide more automation."
"SharePoint sometimes cannot handle the amount of co-editing that we do."
"The workflow engine cannot support the business needs."
"Too many versions being released in a short time period. Too much time being devoted to migration planning."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
"It has worked very well for me. It seems like they've improved everything. I don't have any cons about it as such, but I don't think they have a talk-to-text, speech-to-text, or speech-to-type. That would be cool for accessibility."
"The management of the product/back-end is complex."
"Replication needs improvement."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.