We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It integrates well with other Atlassian products"
"With respect to our experiences with Confluence, we haven't had any issues."
"The solution is stable."
"Great shareable and co-editing features."
"It's easy to search for information."
"The customization that Confluence offers is one of its most useful features. You can customise it based on the specific project you are working on. It also supports multiple languages."
"I love the reports and the Confluence board."
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"The security feature is valuable."
"Information is now available instantly to managers on all devices."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"It offers an easy way to store unstructured content (.pdf, .doc, .xls, images) and to tag them with metadata."
"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
"Information is much more readily available."
"The access control is definitely a good feature. We also appreciate the improvements they've made to the online applications, where multiple users can work on the same documents simultaneously. Everything syncs automatically."
"It keeps our company organized and everything is in one place."
"The roadmap feature should be made easier to work with and modify. It's not really scalable."
"There is room for improvement in terms of pricing."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"The product is considered expensive."
"The flexibility and simplicity of this solution could be improved. We would also like the ability to add plugins."
"An area for improvement would be the intuitiveness of using the features, especially if you want to customize."
"The dashboards should be improved."
"The company also needs to make sure that their policies are dictating how information is stored and used, instead of letting SharePoint take control."
"It is too heavy. MS should not have paid foreign coders dollars per each row of code. They wasted the stability and reliability in the end."
"Flexibility and extensibility, above everything, could be improved."
"Allow more functionalities for the on-premise version. Do not force the move of content to a non-private cloud."
"There are some limitations on storage."
"We would like more security features, like automating."
"It will fully use your system resources."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.