We performed a comparison between AuraQuantic and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."AuraPortal has the best price for its process."
"AuraPortal is very user-friendly and flexible."
"AuraQuantic's most valuable features are the zero code, user-friendly mode, and integration."
"It's a low-code application."
"Powerful, full-featured business process management with excellent support"
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is step-by-step voice guidance that converts your problem statement into different diagrams and then implements the process."
"The user interface and the ease of developing the workflow for an application are valuable features."
"Pega BPM offers a lot of out-of-the-box functionalities."
"The tool reduces our costs."
"It cuts down the time taken for coding. Earlier it used take for us four hours to do a particular code. Now this can be done in less than 30 minutes. That's the kind of productivity gains you can get."
"More documentation and the ability to extract different reports about different relations in the objects I use will help."
"We'd like it more animated. It would be useful if we could integrate GIFs, for example."
"One thing that could be improved would be for it to be deployed in a shorter time."
"AuraQuantic's price could be improved."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"Sometimes when we are patching some data from the database, we are getting added as a timeout."
"Pega Cloud early adoption and use for cross enterprise capability was new to many. The early adoption meant version 2.0 of their cloud service may require refactoring and redesign of some services."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"There is a scarcity of resources who have worked with this solution before."
"I think there is room for improvement in the low code/ no code environment that they're promoting now. That needs to be aligned a little bit more. I still feel that it is not that friendly for a person who has no experience with Pega to just go in and try to create something."
"Pega should work on redefining their model and creating a demand for their skills."
AuraQuantic is ranked 19th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 6 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews. AuraQuantic is rated 8.8, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AuraQuantic writes "Responsive support, easy to use, and reliable". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". AuraQuantic is most compared with Appian, Camunda and Bizagi, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our AuraQuantic vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors, best Process Automation vendors, and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.