We performed a comparison between BlueJeans Meetings and Skype for Business based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It is really easy and there are no complicated graphics or icons. It is simple and has an intuitive design. It's user-friendly over anything else I have used."
"It is available in all flavors. You can use it in the browser, and you can use it on an Android phone for which a BlueJeans app is available. I use an Android phone, so I only know about Android. So, you can join a meeting from the application installed on your phone or from the mobile browser, or you can use it from a laptop or a PC."
"The main advantage is the ability to host large meetings with up to 500 participants. The sound quality is also better on BlueJeans. I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly."
"The quality of both audio and video is good."
"I like the fact that it opens up your video conferencing, and, in many cases, the audio at the same time."
"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."
"There are free versions of the solution available."
"It saves trouble, and it saves us time."
"The product helps me make international calls."
"The most valuable features are the history tracking which allows us to see who participated and who didn't in the meetings as well as the integration with Outlook."
"We like the tools our administrator can use to identify which calls had quality issues and why. This makes troubleshooting our user experience somewhat easier."
"A good option for virtual meetings."
"Screen sharing is available but there is no feature for remote access, to take control of another machine."
"BlueJeans doesn't allow as much customization of your background in a video call, so that could be improved."
"Its cost is very high. If you sell it in India, which is a price-conscious market, the prices should be as per the market competition. You cannot charge the rates that are applicable in the US. They should tailor it to the local market. It should be in line with what the competition is offering."
"I haven't had any big challenges. The annotation feature should be improved. So if I need to mark something or point something out, it's there, but it's not that user friendly. Other than that it's fine. In terms of collaboration, I think there could be some improvement."
"There might be some invitation issues with Skype for Business."
"I venture to say that 30% of the people using this solution at our company have had issues with stability, due to the volatility and crashes."
"I feel bored with the look and feel of the tool, so it should be changed."
"I believe optimizing the solution for lighter endpoints, particularly for embedded endpoints on mobile devices, would be valuable."
"There are some issues with stability during phone calls. Sometimes the connectivity drops, and it is frustrating."
"Going forward, I would like to see better call quality and reliability."
"We need a feature where you can virtually raise your hand to silently let the presenter know that you have a question."
"The initial setup could be simplified."
BlueJeans Meetings is ranked 14th in Virtual Meetings with 4 reviews while Skype for Business is ranked 4th in Virtual Meetings with 59 reviews. BlueJeans Meetings is rated 8.8, while Skype for Business is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of BlueJeans Meetings writes "Accommodates large meetings with up to 500 participants, and I find it pretty intuitive and user-friendly". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Skype for Business writes "Reliable, useful for remote work, and great but isn't as robust as Microsoft Teams". BlueJeans Meetings is most compared with GoToMeeting, whereas Skype for Business is most compared with Webex, Zoom, TeamViewer, GoToMeeting and Cisco Unified Communications. See our BlueJeans Meetings vs. Skype for Business report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
