We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Datadog based on our users’ reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: BMC TrueSight offers quite extensive capabilities such as in-depth analysis, simulated monitoring, proactive oversight, and event administration. Datadog presents valuable features such as customizable displays and reporting, error identification and log consolidation, and ease of use for development teams. BMC TrueSight Operations Management users have concerns regarding deep-dive details, tracing, data agents, reporting, filtration, application monitoring, user interface, setup process, pricing, application visibility tools, dashboards, performance graphs, and stability. Datadog users have highlighted the need for enhancements in usability, integration, learning curve, monitoring, setup, security, customization, AI/ML, documentation, navigability, CSPM, implementation, business analysis, log reporting, dashboard loading, and querying, among other items.
Service and Support: Some customers appreciate the BMC TrueSight Operations Management support team's availability and problem-solving skills, while others have encountered longer response times and a lack of product knowledge. The customer service for Datadog is generally regarded as helpful, responsive, and available around the clock.
Ease of Deployment: The setup process for BMC TrueSight Operations Management can be straightforward or complicated depending on the environment. Datadog's initial setup is generally seen as easy and simple, with some users getting help along the way as needed.
Pricing: BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a high setup cost and limited flexibility. Datadog's pricing and licensing are inconsistent. Some users find it expensive and perplexing, while others consider it reasonable when compared to alternative solutions.
ROI: While ROI relating to BMC TrueSight Operations Management is unclear, users of Datadog mention several advantages, including time savings, reduced blindspots, and fast debugging, which contribute to their satisfaction with the ROI.
Comparison Results: Based on user feedback, Datadog is the preferred choice over BMC TrueSight Operations Management. Users have found Datadog's initial setup process to be easier, more straightforward, painless, and efficient. It can be completed quickly. Datadog offers valuable features like error reporting and log centralization, making it user-friendly for development teams. It also provides a wide range of integrations.
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."
"The fact that they have a very integrated relationship with Sentry Software, the Knowledge Module, is valuable... The richest feature for us is the number of Knowledge Modules that we can load into the product to add breadth of service to the customer. It enables us to move up the operational stack from hardware, to operating system, to application, and to cloud... That enables us to provide one pane of glass over all those layers - hardware, OS, app, and cloud."
"Its event management capabilities are very open and flexible. I haven't seen a use case scenario with a customer that we couldn't actually solve the problem for, so it's really good. There are some interesting things that happen in an enterprise network (things that people don't normally expect), and the event management product is very flexible. You can solve problems as far as your imagination can go with it."
"We have one application, which is fairly large. In the past, we had Level 1 and 2 NOC support teams who were responsible for watching dashboards. When they saw an issue in the application, they would call Level 2 or 3 support and escalate the call, if necessary. Now, through the use of this product, we have been able to reduce the headcount by five people, as we are able to eliminate the eyes on the glass. We no longer have people watching the dashboard. We have events which are processed automatically through the system and get to the right people. We had six people in L1s, and now have one. So, we reduced five out of six headcount, which is pretty significant."
"It is a scalable solution."
"We're using native monitoring capabilities for all our server hardware, for visibility for applications, for URLs, for webpage response and accuracy, and for monitoring network throughput in a lot of particular instances. We're using lightweight protocols for pinging, for DNS, for LDAP."
"It is a stable solution."
"The application performance monitoring is pretty good."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs."
"The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents."
"This spectrum of solutions has allowed us to track down bugs faster and more rapidly, which allows us to limit revenue lost during downtime."
"The biggest thing I liked was the combination of all the things - monitoring, log aggregation, and profiling."
"The Datadog suite has allowed us to easily integrate log collection into all of our services and quickly detect unexpected changes in system data to declare security incidents."
"The dashboards and the performance of the software have been great."
"It would be better if the initial setup and deployment were more straightforward."
"The graphs are extremely limited. We don't have a lot of dashboard options. To make reports and dashboards more useful, we usually need to integrate some dashboard solutions."
"I would like to see a little more out-of-the-box event correlation and expanded AIOps type capabilities. Where you can train your artificial intelligence operations to be able to memorize an issue once you encounter one scenario, so if you encounter that same problem, you can get to the root cause very quickly."
"The solution should improve predicting events and flaws in service. It also needs to improve integration with other systems."
"In a large company of our size, we need multiple people in our company trained. So, I have to take the training classes. Then, I have to go and train the rest of my organization. I would prefer to say to the other people on my team, "Go to this link and..." Or, "Here's a list of training sessions that you can go to which are online and that are free." I think it would help the adoption of their product in the marketplace, personally."
"Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles."
"The product must provide more AI capabilities."
"I think the ease of deployment needs to be looked at. It would be great if the deployment was faster and easier."
"When the logs are too big, and Datadog splits them, the JSON format breaks and it is not so useful for us."
"Datadog could have a better business analysis module."
"We'd like Datadog to make the log storage cheaper."
"For three to four months, we have been experiencing real-time delays. For example, if we're monitoring incoming traffic, the real-time status should be displayed up to a certain point. However, due to delays or issues with Datadog, the real-time data might only be updated at an earlier time. We are experiencing consistent delays in data updates from Datadog, with the most recent data often being delayed by about an hour. This issue has been ongoing for the past four months."
"We would like to see smaller or shorter tutorials and video sessions."
"More pre-configured "Monitor Alerts" would be helpful."
"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."
"We have recently had a number of issues with stability and delays on logging, monitoring, metric evaluation, and alerts."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 16th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 48 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and IBM Tivoli NetCool OMNIbus, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and AppDynamics. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, best AIOps vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.