We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews in five categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: Dynatrace has a user-friendly interface, easy deployment, good scalability, AI capabilities for incident alert automation, and offers a Kubernetes module for topology visualization. Even though the solution is expensive compared to competitors, it provides good value for its cost and is a great choice for companies seeking a user-friendly and scalable solution.
"I like the deep-dive detail and end-user metrics data. The synthetic monitor is the best one. The best point of the new one is that there's no need for configuration. You can inject the Java script and start to change major developments in the application. This is a good approach, and we received all the data using this."
"It is a very stable product."
"It works irrespective of the operating system we’re running."
"The solution's event management capabilities are fantastic. We do a best of breed. If, on the network side, they use a different tool, we pull all that data in so that we have a single console. It's kind of like the monitor of monitors. We're able to aggregate all the different types of data sets, whether it's log data, app data, OS data, infrastructure data, or network data. We're able to aggregate all those events and then correlate and be able to say we're having an event."
"Valuable features include wide support for monitoring, strong event management, service management capability, baselining (analytics) and easy to integrate other tools with it."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"The most valuable features of BMC TrueSight Operations Management are the blackouts and event management."
"The ability to pull hosts together to show what processes are running, so it can be used for change management."
"Dynatrace is a single platform. It has all these different tools but they are actually all baked into the OneAgent technology. Within that OneAgent... you have the different tool sets. You have threat analysis, memory dumps, Java analysis, the database statements, and so on. It's all included in this OneAgent. So the management is actually quite easy."
"If you look in the APM sector, it is a very nice package to install."
"We can report and monitor on specific use cases which could not be monitored with SAP or other tooling."
"Dynatrace can look into application transactions at the packet level, which pretty much relieves us of the work of manually collecting, analyzing, summarizing, and presenting the data, as we had done in the past."
"The deployment configuration and everything is simple. It is not that complicated."
"For cloud, AI has been pretty useful so far when it comes to IT's ability to scale."
"We have drastically reduced the delay taken by the diagnostic phase. As we identify the root cause very rapidly, we can now focus on the solution and communication."
"I find that the AI on offer is useful, as it's good at identifying problems. You do need a bit of customizing, however, even in its sort of vanilla form, it's pretty good at identifying problems and the root causes of those problems and whatnot."
"BMC TrueSight Operations Management could use some enhancements in the application visibility tools."
"Specifically around application performance monitoring, BMC is definitely not the market leader. The Dynatraces, the New Relics and the like are more of the market leaders in that space. I would like to see them grow that space a little bit more aggressively. It has not really been their bread and butter."
"Deployment requires lots of resources (servers). It has too many consoles."
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"The knowledge modules could be more lightweight in size. At present, the installation packages can be quite large."
"BMC's online documentation is often incorrect or incomplete."
"The integration of the tools is getting there. It is still not there yet, because we still have to get a lot of tools to put together."
"Dynatrace has been difficult to set up and use to diagnose problems in the past due to the complex nature of the tool."
"Richer, deeper partner channel: It needs to expand and deepen the business use cases, where their solutions can help."
"For AppMon, in order to use the rich client especially, I think you have to be somebody who is in there more often than not. It's not necessarily as intuitive as it could be."
"sometimes it happens that we are not able to capture things. For example, if a person is logged in from India, from the city of Mumbai, and is using a Chrome browser, and his email ID is xyz@abc.com. But what happens is, Dynatrace just fetches two pieces of the information, not all of it. Sometimes it gets it all, sometimes it doesn't."
"We do not have any web monitoring with Dynatrace."
"For the user, for the customer, they expect a solution to be not so expensive."
"The user interface is complicated, but recent web versions are getting better all the time."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 9th in AIOps with 48 reviews while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in AIOps with 340 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix, New Relic and SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Dynatrace report.
See our list of best AIOps vendors and best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all AIOps reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
