We performed a comparison between BMC TrueSight Operations Management and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I believe that the ease of use and UI is great"
"It is very helpful to be able to apply rule-based routing to alerts."
"The noise reduction for ticketing works much better than we have seen in a lot of other companies."
"It works irrespective of the operating system we’re running."
"It allows our operations team to have one single application to reference when investigating issues in our environment."
"The most valuable features of the solution are alert management, alert generation, and event management."
"The most valuable features of BMC TrueSight Operations Management are the blackouts and event management."
"The major advantage of the product is estate management."
"Firmware compliance is one of the most valuable features."
"It is very stable. We have had no downtime nor issues in approximately a year. "
"Administration-wise it's going to be easier. More smooth and more flexible."
"We also have the 3PAR and the GUI is almost the same. So the recognition is very good."
"Easy to add servers and get them monitored and manageable."
"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."
"Broad range of tools to create executive and operations dashboards."
"Just the ability to provision the servers with storage and network everything within one interface, not having to go into multiple interfaces to provision those pieces."
"The stability of BMC TrueSight Operations Management needs improvement. My organization's infrastructure is vast and implemented based on BMC recommendations, but the solution needs to be optimized for large-capacity infrastructure."
"BMC's solutions for cloud monitoring (monitoring of AWS and Azure resources) are very poor in stability and customization."
"The sizing (which is difficult), the maintenance of it and the upgrade paths. This is a difficult area which is not easy to cover, as every client has a different approach of implementing the product."
"The solution could improve its price."
"Reporting would be an area for improvement in TrueSight... We have almost 800 customers today on TrueSight and just under 10,000 assets. We need to be able to give a customer some information. If the customer's product fails, they'll ask us, "Did it have a problem beforehand?" We have all those events and we know all the problems it had beforehand. We have to be able to give them access to that kind of reporting. That's an enhancement that we need."
"One of the things that the TrueSight environment is missing is some of the HA abilities. The data collection server called the ISM doesn't really have the HA functionality or workload balancing. It was missing from the previous product as well. It's missing redundancy."
"I would like them to improve the deep-dive details, tracing, and data agents in this product. We have EUEM, an end-user experience monitoring appliance. This one's quicker than the current one, and reporting side and filtration side are very bad. There are many details we look at and explain what we receive information in the current one, but we cannot have historical data like we do with EUEM. We cannot have a powerful point to look for specific traffic from a specific application and a specific browser. We don't have it in the new one. The current BMC also needs to add the thing that control versions."
"I would really like to see out-of-the-box support for monitoring uninterruptible power supplies."
"The solution could add storage, integration services, and end-to-end support for Cisco switches or other competitor products."
"I would like to see them expand into other cloud platforms, non-HPE platforms."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"The interface is a bit bland. It does its job, but it could have a better interface."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"Integration could be improved. Sometimes OneView doesn't identify physical hardware."
"It's a little slow sometimes. Overall, I think it does what it's supposed to do. I think that as they evolve it, it'll get quicker."
"It would be better if we can add every HPE device to OneView, such as MSA, as well as the other servers like the DL server and ML server."
More BMC TrueSight Operations Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
BMC TrueSight Operations Management is ranked 21st in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 48 reviews while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. BMC TrueSight Operations Management is rated 8.2, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of BMC TrueSight Operations Management writes "The product is reasonably priced, but the solution is a little obsolete because it is deployed on-premise". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". BMC TrueSight Operations Management is most compared with BMC Helix Monitor, Dynatrace, ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Zabbix and New Relic, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and Datadog. See our BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. HPE OneView report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
