We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere Flow and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Boomi AtomSphere Flow is integrated through APIs, it exposes the API and any product can call the APIs in the queue. Additionally, it is secure."
"In the long run, if you have a good team, solution architect, and an architect from Boomi's side, then it is a good tool from an ROI perspective since it can help save money."
"Boomi AtomSphere Flow is very easy to develop and maintain compared to other tools like SAP HANA Cloud Integration or Cloud Platform."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its core integration with Boomi AtomSphere because it's extremely easy to tap into any informational system of a company."
"It is quite configurable, which is the most exciting feature. We can easily configure it as per our needs."
"Overall, the ability to integrate with multiple applications and effective case management is the most valuable."
"Pricing is a little on the high side."
"It's a good tool for workflow automation."
"Can do a lot of things with minimum time and cost."
"It is a stable product."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"The development effort with Boomi AtomSphere Flow is more when you compare it with other tools, which is a drawback and an area of improvement."
"Its stability could be improved."
"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly. The whole solution is used through an interface and it could always be improved."
"The solution's user interface building needs improvement."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"The biggest thing I have seen is when going from one version to another and upgrading to the latest version, it takes a pretty long time for an organization to go through an upgrade process. I think that's an area where they can make it a little smoother."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"There are some UX shortcomings within the solution. However, it's my understanding that they have addressed them and in the next three months they will come out with a new updated version. They will be moving away from HTML5."
"The cost of licensing could be improved."
"I believe they simplify the application development. It is still complex. The learning is not easy, it takes time compared to other products on the market."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"The pricing model needs to be improved. Right now, it's too expensive."
Boomi AtomSphere Flow is ranked 23rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 4 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 55 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere Flow is rated 8.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere Flow writes "A competent solution for integrating enterprise-grade software". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Low code with great APIs and good flexibility". Boomi AtomSphere Flow is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Apache Airflow, Camunda, Mendix and AWS Step Functions, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Boomi AtomSphere Flow vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors and best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.