We performed a comparison between Camunda and IBM Business Automation Workflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"We like the idea of working with Cawemo because it enables us to keep on working, remotely or not. It allows us to collaborate between areas. It's easy to model and easy to use"
"The most valuable features are the workflow, the task list, and the modeler where we use VPN."
"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"Using the BPMN helps us to have a common shared communication language when discussing processes."
"No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes."
"Its interface is well-designed and user-friendly"
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"It is the only product that includes capture content management and a process suite, as well as rules in RPA."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management."
"This product is tightly integrated with the RPA automation process."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."
"The solution's pricing and scalability could be improved."
"Process interfaces between diagrams could be improved."
"The support definitely can be improved. Apart from that, the language should be extendable to other platforms. If I want to write, I'll run a different platform, like Python code on top of it, or COBOL code on top of it, and it should support those languages."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"I don't like the UI of the Camunda Platform, I have found the Signavio solution to be much better for me to create the process designs and execute them. Additionally, I have found the tools in the Camunda Platform are not compatible with some of my other tools. They should improve this in the future."
"The product must provide more videos and training materials."
"The product does not have a dictionary."
"From what I understand, in the next release they're actually going to combine all of this together as one integrated solution... If we could have one unified way to build a solution, that would really help."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."
"I feel that the features are not user-friendly."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 69 reviews while IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and ADONIS, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation, AWS Step Functions and Nintex Process Platform. See our Camunda vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
