We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"The product has a valuable feature for quick verification of documents."
"We value the way we can tag documentation to Jira because we can cross-reference a Jira ticket to a Confluence page, and we can also add a Confluence page to a Jira ticket."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"It is stable and reliable."
"It's easy to use and you can create all types of pages."
"The ease of use has been one of the most valuable features. It has a very simple wiki."
"The solution helped us to see where we were going wrong and where we were doing good, and that helped us to make proper decisions"
"The most beneficial aspect is real-time collaboration, allowing multiple users to work on the same documents simultaneously."
"It has improve our organization by speeding up document sharing."
"Document flows, storage, and numbering take off the actions for checking and assigning the numbering and running around with approvals and pre-approvals."
"It has an easy to distribute administration capability, and can also scale to meet a large number of future needs."
"It improved transparency around work products."
"It is very stable."
"The most valuable features are the Integrations, web site, and search."
"OneDrive and SharePoint provide a secure, fully auditable way of storing information."
"Information is much more readily available."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"I would like to see the text editor upgraded from its current limited abilities."
"Atlassian Confluence could improve the stability, there are timeouts sometimes."
"I think the couple of improvement areas would be around Markdown support and support for adding code."
"We would like there to be more advanced data manipulation features available in this solution, such as creating more complex charts, and a column freezing option."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"When we import the data in Confluence from Word or any other document, the formatting is not correct."
"The product is considered expensive."
"It does not integrate despite being part of the Microsoft family."
"There are some limitations on storage."
"Using SharePoint is difficult."
"It should have a Google-caliber search ability and a model-based GUI."
"SharePoint’s scalability could be improved."
"Replication needs improvement."
"The areas of this solution that need improvement are the relationships between lists, cross-site web parts, and page-building tools."
"One issue is that when users mistakenly hide files or set permissions incorrectly, it can lead to files becoming inaccessible, requiring intervention from Microsoft support to resolve."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, WordPress and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
