We performed a comparison between Drupal and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Wordpress, Adobe and others in Web Content Management."The feature I find most valuable is that Drupal is a framework and not only a CMS."
"It is good for big projects."
"We use a part of the solution called Acquia. The personalization portion of this is the most valuable aspect fo the solution."
"You can build websites on it very quickly."
"The product is tamper-proof and enables us to return to the document source, which is helpful in legal issues."
"Two things are excellent in Documentum. One is business process management. The other is its support for metadata."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"It stands out for its impressive records management capabilities and the ability to handle an extensive volume of documents, even reaching into the billions."
"It is a very secure system. It is reliable, and that is one of the reasons people manage their content within Documentum. It gives them the confidence that the content is accessible to the right people and not to the wrong people."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText Documentum is the versioning."
"Documentum is a highly scalable document management solution because it's built on a solid platform."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"It is a little bit simplified."
"Digital experience features like target, segmentation, and campaign management have a long way to go."
"The user experience in designing layouts should be much easier or much more helpful."
"I think the support needs to improve, as well as the integration with tracking and analytics systems."
"It should provide more tools to help clients upgrade solutions based on Webtop."
"OpenText Documentum's user interface could be improved a little bit."
"I would like to see performance improvements, especially regarding slow response times."
"One area for improvement in OpenText Documentum is its handling of outdated documents, especially technical ones."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"The documentation often leaves customers feeling somewhat frustrated, as OpenText seems to expect customers to remind them constantly about the need for better documentation, as they don't provide clear guidance on their documentation practices."
"The main issue is the software's performance when storing around 10 million or more documents. It becomes slow and needs improvement. Perhaps it's a cloud-related issue, but it needs to be addressed. It could be due to our S3 bucket or something else. Nevertheless, this is a significant challenge we're facing."
"The product needs to improve the way documents are logged together. I believe running it on the cloud or containerization will bring value to it. The tool's Time to Market and deployment cycle need to be improved. Finding suitable training materials for OpenText Documentum is also a bottleneck. If we can find the training modules easily, we can bring together people, give them quick training, and start working on the deployment. It can help with quick outputs."
Earn 20 points
Drupal is ranked 5th in Web Content Management while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Drupal is rated 8.6, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Drupal writes "Through my different companies, we have developed many Drupal sites, from simple ones to complex E-commerce sites and custom made applications. The UI could be improved, though". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Drupal is most compared with SharePoint, WordPress, Adobe Experience Manager, Magnolia CMS and Plone, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet and Hyland OnBase.
We monitor all Web Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
