We performed a comparison between NTT-AT WinActor and Pega Robotic Process Automation based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is data import. The OCR feature helps to recognize the data. It can recognize screen and document numbers well."
"This software is very smart - it can decide from a picture if we like that condition, and then the robot will do that action."
"It is a good and matured solution."
"The workflow system is very intuitive."
"If you want to make any kind of base automation, you can easily code exactly what you want."
"The tech support is highly available and there is plenty of online training available."
"User-friendly, easy to understand and has many features including the ability to track."
"Pega is very mature. It's very old. They have grown with time, and they have learned. Other robotic process automation solutions are basically focused on only doing the automation, whereas Pega also gives you a workflow system so that you can create a workflow."
"The low-code/no-code development aspect of the solution is great."
"It helped cut short the release cycle by almost 40% compared to the previous solution."
"Something that could be improved is that this solution can't run when the computer is locked, which meant we had to implement it in our own on-prem server as it never auto-locks."
"The OCR has issues recognizing handwritten data."
"The orchestration needs to be better."
"It's difficult not knowing when alerts will arrive."
"The OCR capabilities of the solution could be improved."
"The way integration classes are created could be improved."
"The development experience needs to be improved."
"The handwritten structured and semi-structured data recognition accuracy is much lower and is an area that definitely needs to improve."
"There have been some scenarios where the bot was not able to replace some of the controls and could not recognize and personalize the task we wanted to automate."
"The new players such as UiPath and ABBYY are moving very quickly, but Pega is not. I'd definitely like to see Pega doing a few more interesting things on the AI or machine learning front so that we can use the platform for multiple things."
More Pega Robotic Process Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
NTT-AT WinActor is ranked 27th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 2 reviews while Pega Robotic Process Automation is ranked 9th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 22 reviews. NTT-AT WinActor is rated 7.0, while Pega Robotic Process Automation is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NTT-AT WinActor writes "Frees up employee time but can't run when computer system is locked". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega Robotic Process Automation writes "Great for UI creation, helpful support services, and reliable". NTT-AT WinActor is most compared with UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate, whereas Pega Robotic Process Automation is most compared with UiPath, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA), Microsoft Power Automate and Pega CRM. See our NTT-AT WinActor vs. Pega Robotic Process Automation report.
See our list of best Robotic Process Automation (RPA) vendors.
We monitor all Robotic Process Automation (RPA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
