We performed a comparison between Oracle BPEL and Pega BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Process Automation solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."What I find the most valuable about Oracle BPEL is that it saves me time."
"The product has everything we need."
"The technical support of Pega BPM is very good."
"Pega is a local platform that has evolved from a BPM perspective. This allows teams using this solution to address complexities without having deep knowledge in a specific development area."
"Application development is very rapid. A lot of code gets reused while building the applications, which is something we highly appreciate."
"The most valuable feature is the situational layer cake."
"The most valuable features of the solution are case management, routing, and low-code environment."
"Decreased time for plane departures and landing, supported analytical insight for planning of three to six month forecasting, and helped with operational decision planning and support."
"The solution's case management is its most valuable aspect."
"It is easy to use, easy to understand, easy to implement and easy to enhance and we can do it as a Cloud. Also it is very user friendly."
"In the next release, I would like to see REST improved and new technologies for microservices. I'd like to see more containers for separating containers."
"Some user-defined functions for transformation must be added to the next release of the solution."
"They are currently spending some time on improving the product with respect to machine learning, especially related to robotic automation. They probably could be a little more adept on that area would help."
"We have experienced a few technical challenges, particularly triggering the workflow through file drops and accessing files."
"Currently, there isn't any feature I want to be added in the next release of Pega BPM because Pega always adds new features that my team welcomes and looks forward to learning. One area for improvement in the solution is the long learning curve, but after that, you'll find Pega BPM easy to use."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
"The way the IDE works with the chatbox and the taxonomy imports could be a little smoother."
"Compared to other BPM products, the interface is somewhat complex, so the usability could be improved."
"The solution could be more scalable."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
Oracle BPEL is ranked 18th in Process Automation with 2 reviews while Pega BPM is ranked 2nd in Process Automation with 57 reviews. Oracle BPEL is rated 9.0, while Pega BPM is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle BPEL writes "A highly scalable solution that provides various features for the execution of business processes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Fastens application development and has all the features to meet the requirements of our customers". Oracle BPEL is most compared with Camunda, BizTalk Server and Bonita, whereas Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, Microsoft Power Apps and IBM BPM. See our Oracle BPEL vs. Pega BPM report.
See our list of best Process Automation vendors.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.