We performed a comparison between Atlassian Confluence and SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Easy to share information and the integration with JIRA is good."
"With respect to our experiences with Confluence, we haven't had any issues."
"The best feature is document management."
"The search functionality is a really powerful feature."
"The most valuable features are the ease of creating documentation, as well as charts."
"The most valuable feature of Atlassian Confluence is the ability to access your files from anywhere."
"Confluence can link any ticket or task from JIRA to be included on the Confluence page."
"As for valuable features, the team management features help us to share information very easily."
"Ability to store files of any type."
"Helps with document collaboration and workflow."
"The workflow feature is valuable because it enables us to cascade responsibilities."
"Staff training is reduced because learning basic SharePoint is not as complicated as an EDRMS."
"Combined reports and data with timeline tracking."
"We can now share to team members by MS Teams and assign planners to follow and update statuses in a single platform."
"The product provides flexibility in collaboration."
"Quantity and variety of partners with solution development ability on the platform."
"The solution is not very user-friendly."
"I would like Confluence to include the ability to draw flowcharts and diagrams."
"There is no concept of peer review or a draft mode - whatever you write is live."
"The way Atlassian Confluence handles tickets could be improved."
"The user interface could be improved."
"RAM usage seems to be higher than it should be."
"It lacks ease of integration."
"The cost of the solution is too high."
"Replication needs improvement."
"I would like it to be more compliant with global regulations. There are certain features which could be included that currently are not there, such as compliance and record management capabilities."
"The initial setup was very complex."
"The integration with Outlook could be improved."
"The solution lacks collaboration features."
"The way to change the version of the files in SharePoint should be improved. The method of synchronizing files from local to the cloud can also use improvement."
"Annoyingly, many new Office 365 apps always end up being only US locale for the first year of their life. Microsoft needs to realise that most of their customers are not in the USA."
"This solution would benefit from the implementation of enhanced online forms and template development capabilities."
Atlassian Confluence is ranked 2nd in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 99 reviews while SharePoint is ranked 1st in Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) with 146 reviews. Atlassian Confluence is rated 8.2, while SharePoint is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Atlassian Confluence writes "Good usability, helpful community support, and facilitates well-structured documentation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SharePoint writes "Good integrations, helps with collaboration, and increases visibility". Atlassian Confluence is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Office 365, Microsoft OneDrive, Zendesk and Slack, whereas SharePoint is most compared with Citrix ShareFile, Microsoft OneDrive, Dropbox, Box and Hyland OnBase. See our Atlassian Confluence vs. SharePoint report.
See our list of best Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) vendors.
We monitor all Corporate Portals (Enterprise Information Portals) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.