We performed a comparison between StarLeaf and Zoom based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zoom Video Communications, Cisco, TeamViewer and others in Virtual Meetings."The pros are that it's like a global leader. It has a translation project, which is very interesting and important for our users because the minority of them are not able to read and speak in English."
"The solution is easy to navigate."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ease of use."
"The solution is very user friendly and flexible."
"There are many valuables features of Zoom. The visibility is very good. The ability to see everyone that is talking and the indication spotlight of who the primary speaker is helpful. The solution is interactive, the participants are able to raise their hand, comment, give gestures, such as thumbs up or down."
"The product quality is very good."
"The most valuable features of Zoom are the screen blur and the background transition, which is great because we are working from home. Without this feature we would not have private meetings, they do not need to see what is happening in our background. The background transition is good with Zoom."
"I've been using Zoom since the pandemic started. It's actually been a life saving product under the circumstances that were thrust on everybody."
"like Zoom because it's a very simple program. We have more success using Zoom with clients, partners, and everybody else. Everybody seems to be able to get Zoom. Some people struggle with Teams."
"We have had some problems with stability. A week ago, we had outaging but it has stablized."
"Zoom lacks dashboards, more could be included."
"The cost should be cheaper."
"The product's interface needs enhancement."
"The security and chat features should improve in Zoom."
"I don't have any particular issues, but I think the user interface could be improved. Previously, I used Microsoft Teams, where the chat, video, and audio options were all easily accessible in one place, making the user experience smoother. In Zoom, it's a bit more manual. For example, we must use external chat options like Slack and manually send the Zoom URL link to initiate a chat. In MicrosoftTeams, you can directly call and chat with someone from the contact list simultaneously."
"They could address the product's limitation of the free version, particularly the 40-minute time constraint on meetings."
"I can't speak to any aspect that needs improvement."
"I found it very confusing to set up a meeting."
Earn 20 points
StarLeaf is ranked 42nd in Virtual Meetings while Zoom is ranked 1st in Virtual Meetings with 201 reviews. StarLeaf is rated 9.0, while Zoom is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of StarLeaf writes "Easy to use for our clients and was easy to roll out ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoom writes "Easy to use and provides good video and sound quality". StarLeaf is most compared with , whereas Zoom is most compared with Webex, Skype for Business, TeamViewer, Cisco TelePresence and Cisco Meeting Server.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
