Amazon AWS Reviews

I use this solution to build IoT products.

I am a customer and I have a reselling agreement.

We use this product to build our products and services, which is what we sell.

I like that all of the features are complimentary. I use all of the features together.

It's very user-friendly.

There is nothing that needs changing.

The interface could be improved.

I have been using Amazon AWS for two years.

It is a very stable product.

Amazon is based on scalability. You can scale as you require. We have no issues with scalability.

The technical support is very good.

The initial setup is easy.

I completed the installation myself.

Pricing is good.  It's average.

I also evaluated Microsoft Azure.

I would advise others to use the platform.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

The primary use case is that we run all our IT on it. The performance has been okay so far.

With the pay-as-you-go model, we don't have to predict future IT needs. We can just scale up as we want. That helps with a lot of agility in deploying stuff in our IT infrastructure.

• It's pay-as-you-go.
• It has a breadth of solutions for databases, data mining, AI.
• They release new solutions almost every quarter and you don't get that kind of innovation from an enterprise company.

The AWS documentation is written in a way that is not very intuitive. That's an area they can improve.

Stability is really good. We have not had downtime so far.

Ours is a new company and we decided to go with AWS right from the beginning.

The most important criterion when selecting a vendor is their ability to help us get started as soon as we can. From the time we decide to deploy something to the time when the application is deployed, we look at which vendor will help us reduce that time.

The initial setup was straightforward.

I think the pricing becomes a problem as the IT organization grows. They need to give better pricing when companies grow.

We looked at all the cloud platforms. AWS had more breadth in the services they offered.

Look for what is required to deploy the apps in your particular organization. For example, if it's AI-driven then probably Google is a better cloud to go after. If there are a lot of Microsoft applications or if developers or the IT staff were trained in Microsoft software, then Microsoft Azure is a better fit.

I would rate AWS an eight out of 10 because it helps companies get started fast.

I am the leader of a team that runs cloud operations for our clients. We work with AWS on a daily basis using it for synthetic and real use monitoring. Our company is partnered with AWS.

Since AWS came a bit later to the market, they are always improving and upgrading their platform.

They do not yet have a complete solution for APM monitoring. But this, along with real user monitoring, is something that they are actively working on improving.

I have been using AWS for about a year. 

The solution is very stable.

The solution is easily scalable.

My team and I have not needed to contact support.

In general, the initial setup was quite easy.

I would rate this product a seven out of ten.

We had previously been working on a local office server. Our local server wasn't performing well, so we switched to the AWS cloud service. We want to provide smooth service from our application to our end-users.

We first deployed Amazon ASW five or six months ago.

AWS is stable. 

AWS could be more scalable. We have two versions of our product: desktop and cloud. And there are approximately 100 to 200 users there. 

We get our first-line support from our in-house support, and they deal with Amazon support.

I rate Amazon AWS eight out of 10

We use the solution only internally as a private cloud to store our files, our projects, and to keep our servers running.

The customization could be improved. 

We found the solution to be reliable.

In my experience the scalability is good. We have six people using the solution in my organization.

We never had to use the support but I have heard the support was good.

The installation was simple because we already have set it up before, it was very quick.

We did the deployment ourselves. Since we only use the solution for our internal files it allowed us to do the deployment in just one day. 

The price could be better.

I rate Amazon AWS a nine out of ten.

We are a car company and we use this solution for our customers.

It has a lot of features to keep up with.

It has good reporting and documentation.

The dashboard and interface need improvement.

It could be more user-friendly.

I have been using Amazon AWS for half a year.

We are using the latest version.

It's highly stable. We have not had any issues with stability.

We have not explored this area yet.

My department is quite small. We have three to five people in my team who are using this solution.

My experience with technical support has gone very well. They are very responsive. They are pretty cool.

We are using OpenShift to combine two platforms.

It's pretty hard to deploy. Our IT takes care of this area.

We are happy with the pricing.

Definitely, I would recommend this solution to others.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

The primary use case of this solution is for hosting your infrastructure.

It's very easy to use.

The activation process can be improved. Sometimes, the activation takes a lot of time. There are many components of the infrastructure.

Integration with in-house applications could be simplified.

We have been dealing with Amazon AWS for one year.

We are using the latest version.

It's a stable solution.

It is a scalable product. We have 30 users in our organization.

We plan to continue to use Amazon AWS.

We have never had a problem with technical support.

There is no installation for this solution. It's a cloud solution.

There is a cost for any components you get.

AWS is not an expensive product.

I absolutely recommend this product.

I would rate Amazon AWS an eight out of ten.

Elastic Load Balancer: AWS completely manages ELB with less configuration from the users' side. Setting up the load balancer manually is really a headache.

Deploying to the elastic cloud is much easier now with AWS. This makes the go-live process easy.

Billing: They should make billing more simplified. It would be great if they could explain how deploying to elastic cloud is much easier now with AWS. Elastic beans command line interface [eb cli]: You can easily deploy code straight from your code IDE.

The billing calculator has lot of options which confuses the user. If they could provide some template for billing and directly execute those template, that would be great.

For example, the billing template for the standard WordPress Server with Load Balancer and S3 Connectivity: Users could just change the parameters inside the template and execute to see their estimated billing.

We have been using this solution for three years.

I did not encounter any issues with stability.

I did not encounter any issues with scalability.

We were using only AWS.

The setup was straightforward in all ways.

Free tier is always there for demo and testing. Pricing is based on the usage.

We evaluated Microsoft Azure.

AWS is good for any kind of requirements.