We performed a comparison between Cisco Meeting Server and Zoom based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server."
"Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution."
"The UI is user-friendly and very good overall."
"What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration."
"You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff."
"It's got a simple, easy-to-understand user interface."
"Zoom works fine, and its interface is easier to use than, for example, Teams, which is the other tool I would compare it to. It's also easy to schedule Zoom meetings through Outlook."
"Zoom is a stable solution."
"The high capacity means that you can have a lot of people in the same meeting. I once attended a meeting with approximately 400 people."
"Zoom is scalable. We have about 10,000 users at my company."
"The ability to discuss and share training content would be the most valuable features of Zoom."
"Zoom is easy to use."
"Overall, Zoom is a good product because we are using it globally, and it is a good way of connecting with everyone globally."
"A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app."
"In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session."
"What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions."
"This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier."
"The price must be improved."
"The solution is pricier than its competitors."
"The only issue I have is that some clients have difficulty connecting to the audio side of things."
"I would appreciate it if the updates weren't so frequent."
"Zoom should also include features like the automatic transcribing of conversations."
"When you are connected to one device and you're going to log into another one, Zoom should ask you to transfer without having to disconnect you."
"It would be great if there was a bit more camera control. For example, cropping the image, and improving the background remover features, which can be buggy right now."
"I can't speak of any shortcomings. It worked fine."
Cisco Meeting Server is ranked 9th in Virtual Meetings with 5 reviews while Zoom is ranked 1st in Virtual Meetings with 201 reviews. Cisco Meeting Server is rated 8.4, while Zoom is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Meeting Server writes "A scalable tool useful to hold conferences and video meetings". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zoom writes "Easy to use and provides good video and sound quality". Cisco Meeting Server is most compared with Webex, Pexip, Skype for Business, Huawei Video Conferencing Platform and Cisco TelePresence, whereas Zoom is most compared with Webex, Skype for Business, Cisco TelePresence, TeamViewer and GoToMeeting. See our Cisco Meeting Server vs. Zoom report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.