We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and ServiceNow Now Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."When I write code, I feel like I have someone sitting with me to help me. Wherever I'm stuck, I just ask a question, and it provides guidance that I can use."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"GitHub CoPilot accelerates productivity. It is an easy-to-use solution that is also helpful in saving the team's time."
"The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"GitHub CoPilot has good stability and performance."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"We work on it directly to send out tickets. It enables us to work seamlessly, we don't need to send them out manually. We can create a ticket and assign it in the system."
"It can integrate anywhere, and you can make any kind of workflow."
"The most valuable feature of the ServiceNow Now Platform is the workspaces feature, which allows you to create customized workspaces."
"Now Platform's best features are collaboration, configurability, and customizability."
"ITOM Discovery is a great feature."
"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."
"ServiceNow Now Platform is quite useful, scalable, and flexible. The user interface is very good."
"The integration with other tools is pretty good."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's alerting features need improvement."
"In certain instances, OpenAI didn't respond in the expected way. The responses were more general and didn't address the specific point."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The UI is not intuitive."
"The reporting capabilities need to be improved, otherwise we need to pay for performance analytics."
"In ServiceNow Now Platform, UI is an area with certain shortcomings requiring improvements."
"From an improvement perspective, the product's complicated initial setup phase can be made a bit easier."
"The UI is very bad and needs to be updated."
"It's not quick or cheap."
"There are a few areas of concern when it comes to the product's support team where improvements are required."
"This platform is used more by large companies because it is a little bit expensive."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while ServiceNow Now Platform is ranked 11th in Rapid Application Development Software with 36 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while ServiceNow Now Platform is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ServiceNow Now Platform writes "A highly scalable product that covers multiple areas, like ITSM, ITOM, and ITIL". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and CucumberStudio, whereas ServiceNow Now Platform is most compared with ServiceNow, Microsoft Power Apps, OpenText AppWorks , Appian and Hyland OnBase. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. ServiceNow Now Platform report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.