We performed a comparison between GoToMeeting and Microsoft Teams based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Virtual Meetings solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution worked well specifically for audio meetings."
"Reduced the need for physically commuting between offices."
"Screenshare is the most valuable feature as well as the number of meeting participants possible in a meeting. It also has good quality."
"It works, it's reliable."
"Pricing is reasonable. It's not expensive. The pricing is one of the great selling points for the product."
"GoToMeeting's low latency is crucial because everybody is using VPN to connect to their PCs at work. The sound and video quality are solid, and the whiteboarding features were especially useful. The administrative side of it was fairly simple and intuitive to use."
"It was just chosen because somebody at the company said, "We need a meeting thing. Hey, go find a meeting thing." It wasn't me, but somebody else in the organization was like, "Alright, let's use GoToMeeting. It's free.""
"It's cost-effective."
"I use the solution to chat with my team."
"I think it is stable when I use it for meetings with my customers...The initial setup of Microsoft Teams is easy."
"The solution's stability is quite good, and it doesn't crash and freeze up when you have a large number of users."
"The solution's most valuable features are robust security and communication within teams or channels."
"This is a reliable and stable solution."
"We can build a team with a group of people and upload documents."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool is very useful since it helps us to share documents and make calls."
"The sound quality is good but the video quality needs improvement."
"It is not so stable."
"GoToMeeting is too slow, which is why we no longer use it."
"The product itself doesn't stand out against other options on the market."
"The newer user interface takes a bit longer to get used to."
"Lacks ease of connectivity, calendar integrations, and third-party app integrations."
"In addition to the features it already has, I think GoToMeeting should also have additional features that are not present at the moment."
"The interface is a little outdated and could be better."
"I would like to get more frequent updates, and the solution’s stability could be improved."
"Technical support could be improved."
"If it's a group chat, then we can record the session, but we cannot record a one on one session."
"Signing up for a new device for the solution is challenging."
"Whiteboard should be standard rather than an app."
"It is challenging to navigate the setting for the screen-sharing feature."
"This solution is not as popular for companies to use as other solutions making it a disadvantage."
"Adding and integrating more apps like SharePoint on Microsoft Teams is making the solution very slow."
GoToMeeting is ranked 11th in Virtual Meetings with 24 reviews while Microsoft Teams is ranked 5th in Virtual Meetings with 145 reviews. GoToMeeting is rated 7.8, while Microsoft Teams is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of GoToMeeting writes "It features low latency, which is crucial because everybody is using VPN to connect to their PCs at work". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Teams writes "Great for project planning and monitoring with easy communication capabilities". GoToMeeting is most compared with Skype for Business, Zoom, TeamViewer and Adobe Connect, whereas Microsoft Teams is most compared with Atlassian Confluence, SharePoint, Symphony, Loom and Avaya Spaces. See our GoToMeeting vs. Microsoft Teams report.
See our list of best Virtual Meetings vendors.
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
