We performed a comparison between Nintex Process Platform and Oracle BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Out of box connectivity with UiPath."
"It has a lot of features for creating and managing workflows, as well as for integrating with other applications. Nintex offers features, particularly to ensure a user-friendly experience."
"It leverages the out-of-the-box SharePoint back-end. This means that you don’t need to install or deploy additional infrastructure to support Nintex Workflow, unlike some of its competitors."
"The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform."
"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."
"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."
"K2's best feature is that it can solve complex tasks, issues, and projects with little coding."
"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."
"Our company is based around Oracle processes. It provides a lot of flexibility in its processes."
"It has developmental accelerators, which allow for virtually any customization needs which you may require."
"The processor management system is quite fast and scalable. We have 10 developers using this solution and it supports 25,000 users."
"One of the most valuable features of Oracle BPM is the workflow itself. It is quite intuitive."
"We selected this solution not only for the BPM but for the entire package."
"We have more than 800 distinct applications in our IT landscape. We had enough scalability and okay development cycles, and it has been enough to cover our backup operations and order management systems."
"The solution provides extensive functionalities."
"The benefit from the tool is we can develop it quickly and easily use it for middleware services. We can publish the services so other applications can consume them. This is providing us some reusability and a type of security."
"We are currently facing a lot of issues with Nintex, and we are trying to move away from this solution."
"The interface could be better and more language support is needed in the development environment or in the solutions platform in general."
"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."
"Built-in reporting on-prem is limited and clunky at best."
"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."
"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."
"Hawkeye is emerging as a reporting solution, but as a V1 product it’s not very useful yet."
"While Nintex Workflow has pretty robust troubleshooting abilities, I think that improving the default logging and notifications would be helpful."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."
"Pricing is an area that could use improvement."
"Though Oracle BPM is a stable solution, it's very heavy, so this is one area for improvement. If Oracle can make the components of Oracle BPM lighter, and if the deployment for the solution could be easier, that would make Oracle BPM better."
"Existing APIs in the product need to be fine-tuned, made more robust and flexible for adoption."
"Oracle BPM could probably be improved with respect to the cost. When you are using this product, it'll be a bit costlier for the ROA. I think they should do some discounts on these products, especially for the licenses."
"It could have easier administration. It takes time to configure and deploy."
"Oracle BPM is hard to configure."
"The product must reduce its cost."
Nintex Process Platform is ranked 9th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Oracle BPM is ranked 14th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 22 reviews. Nintex Process Platform is rated 8.0, while Oracle BPM is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Nintex Process Platform writes "Offers good integration capabilities and easy to learn and good stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle BPM writes "Stable, has a lot of features and out-of-the-box integrations, but it's heavy, and the technical support isn't good". Nintex Process Platform is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Appian, Pega BPM and Bizagi, whereas Oracle BPM is most compared with Camunda, SAP Signavio Process Manager, IBM BPM, AWS Step Functions and Apache Airflow. See our Nintex Process Platform vs. Oracle BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
