We performed a comparison between Pega BPM and SAP Signavio Process Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Pega BPM's most valuable feature is the use of CDX to solve problems."
"The case management is great."
"The most valuable feature of Pega BPM is its architecture."
"There is a feature to accelerate the development so that business analysts can directly create their user stories and assign the task to the developers."
"Fast prototyping."
"The ability to define processes, build reports, and get insights or analytics on data is most valuable. It is a powerful platform."
"The solution is able to support the size and scale required."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its quick setup. Nowhere else you can create a good-looking application this quick. It's a fairly robust system."
"Process Manager is really helpful in building process maps. Creating them is really easy; the program is user-friendly."
"Process Manager supports end-to-end transformation. Students can better understand end-to-end activity and processes as well as how they are run. For teaching, it's process discovery, then modeling, and finally optimization and simulation, partly. Typically, we showcase some simulation of the processes, and this is where we finish. That is why we validate that it's properly designed, but also what are the outcomes of modeled processes. There are also options for discussion on process optimization."
"It is possible to do the whole drafting process at the same time in Sagnavio so you don't have a double effort of writing it once, arranging it and entering it again."
"This functionality ("invite anyone for feedback") has substantially increased visibility over work-in-progress when it comes to process modelling and overall process management and it decreased the time spent on giving and receiving feedback through emails and through sharing screenshots/.ppt files/Visio files etc."
"I really like the Collaboration Hub because it's so easy to communicate. And what is really important is that you can use it asynchronously. It doesn't matter if you're working in Italy or in America. You are using the same process and you can speak about the same process."
"Process management/Process governance is what we think Signavio is very good at."
"In my opinion, the most valuable feature is the editor and its ease of use, and when people are looking at it, they can make comments about changes that need to be made."
"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."
"The unit testing needs to improve, as well as the user interface."
"Pega BPM could be improved by including token-based authentication and extending its integration options."
"The UI part needs improvement."
"Its implementation in the public sector was a bit complex."
"It needs more integration with other platforms."
"The main problem with Pega is that it is quite complex, so it is very difficult for the developer to learn."
"To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that."
"I would like to see Pega BPM improve the user experience."
"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."
"The performance metrics appearing in the collaboration hub needs to be improved."
"We would like a better way to give users the correct permissions for processes, whether to view or design."
"Part of the product that I think can improve is document control. That's currently not even possible. To work with documents we have something of a workaround using SharePoint."
"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."
"The workflow automation of the solution is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."
"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."
Pega BPM is ranked 3rd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 57 reviews while SAP Signavio Process Manager is ranked 8th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 58 reviews. Pega BPM is rated 8.2, while SAP Signavio Process Manager is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Pega BPM writes "Provides built-in frameworks that can be reused and reduces time and cost". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Signavio Process Manager writes "Has many functionalities and is used to model processes to the former operating model". Pega BPM is most compared with ServiceNow, Camunda, Appian, IBM BPM and GitHub CoPilot, whereas SAP Signavio Process Manager is most compared with Celonis, ARIS BPA, Camunda, Visio and Bizagi. See our Pega BPM vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
