We performed a comparison between Camunda and OpenText Documentum based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Camunda, Sparx Systems and others in Business Process Design."Its flexibility stands out as the most valuable feature."
"The graphical interface is very beneficial."
"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."
"We have a lot of users, almost 1,800, and we needed something affordable, stable and something that could be used by a large financial company. This solution truly fit the bill."
"Camunda Platform is better than IBM BPM, and Azure. It is more elaborate."
"The ease with which I can define workflows is most valuable. The latest updates and flexibility that it provides around a task activity are interesting for me."
"Ease of use and ability to streamline a process model."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"The stability is very good."
"We like Documentum for its capacity and reliability."
"The most valuable feature is that it's a central repository for everything, whether it's videos, documents, Excel sheets, etc."
"It has reduced the amount of paper documents; reducing time and errors in the process."
"The tool's most valuable feature is ACL, which helps to control the user groups that access the documents."
"The most valuable feature is the management."
"OpenText Documentum has improved availability and performance in our organization."
"We primarily use it for storing documents. We host a variety of documents in OpenText Documentum. This includes raw files, analyzed files, and documents in multiple formats."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"Initial setup can be quite complex."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."
"I have faced problems in bringing up the Cockpit in terms of GUI processes. I think that there is room for improvement in those areas."
"I think it would be important to internationalize the Cockpit and the Admin as well as with the Tasklist."
"I would like to see better pricing."
"The documentation could use improvement."
"The biggest issue for us is the price of the product."
"OpenText Documentum needs to improve its support."
"OpenText Documentum is moving to the cloud, and I am concerned about the security aspect of it."
"The user interface can be a bit more intuitive."
"It needs a better UI and it should also be cloud-ready. The UI has not changed in years."
"Sometimes DocBroker cannot see the DocBase."
"We mostly use the Life Sciences package. That package is somewhat dated. There should be enhancements to the Life Science package and additional offerings to support pharma in particular."
"Documentum is a very robust system. Everything can be improved, but at this time, I do not have anything in particular. If anything, they can put our software in their standard."
Camunda is ranked 2nd in Business Process Design with 69 reviews while OpenText Documentum is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 26 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while OpenText Documentum is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Documentum writes "Saves time and increases an organization's productivity". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas OpenText Documentum is most compared with OpenText Extended ECM, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and Alfresco.
We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.