We performed a comparison between ForgeRock and IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SailPoint, One Identity and others in Identity Management (IM)."The Governance and self-service that can be set up so you can use them yourself to work in the system are the most valuable features. End users can be enabled to help themselves."
"Omada's most valuable aspect is its usability."
"As an administrator, we benefit from a lot of functionality that is available out of the box, but it is also configurable to meet our specific needs."
"The administrative features and SoD are valuable."
"The benefits of Omada Identity include a holistic way of viewing access, the ability to give people access, and automation."
"Surveying is a valuable feature because it allows us to import data and see who has access to what data, for example."
"The best feature in Omada Identity is that it enables us to implement standardized employee life cycle processes so that we don't have to create them ourselves. We can then use the standard workflows. The breadth and scope of the solution’s IGA features also fulfill our requirements."
"It has a very user-friendly interface compared to what we are used to, and it is highly configurable. In the old solution, when we needed to do something, we had to have a programmer sitting next to us, whereas, in Omada Identity, everything is configurable."
"Their access management solution, OpenAM, is most valuable because it meets the needs of a lot of users."
"I like the way it is handling authentication and authorization."
"ForgeRock products are customizable, and the out-of-the-box features are solid, too. I primarily use the OIDC compliance features. It's just a configuration. it's easy to set up and customize trees. We can add our own features if necessary. Banks and corporations have different standards and specific validations."
"ForgeRock has CIAM, which other products didn't have, and they have DevOps ready."
"Installation and configuration are pretty easy for ForgeRock OpenIDM."
"The solution's most valuable feature is the authentication for the consumers. The integration with other third-party applications is excellent."
"This is a stable solution. When you do experience any issues, you will see it in your DB logs or audit logs so you can easily reach a conclusion of might be causing it."
"We have found the identity and access management tools in the solution to be particularly useful for our organization."
"Lifecycle management, governance and documentation."
"I would rate the price eight out of 10, with 10 as the best value for money."
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pros →
"There's a challenge with handling large amounts of data in this system."
"I would like to see them expand the functionality of the tool to continue to be competitive with the monsters out there. For example, they could add functionality on the authentication side, functionality that Octa and SailPoint have. But they should do that while maintaining the same simplicity that makes Omada a product of choice today."
"The solution should be made more agile for customers to own or configure."
"The web GUI can be improved."
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."
"There is room for improvement in Omada's integration capabilities, particularly in streamlining complex integrations and enhancing programming logic for better rule management."
"The Omada support response time has room for improvement."
"Its flexibility is both a good thing and a bad thing. Because it is very flexible, it also becomes too complex. This is common for most of the products we evaluated. Its scalability should be better. It had a few scalability issues."
"In an upcoming release, the solution could improve by limiting the need to do customizations."
"They should improve the solution by include reporting."
"The solution's documentation is not very good, and they do not give more details."
"I find that it's quite expensive for just an open-source system. Support is quite expensive."
"The user interface could be improved as it is cumbersome and outdated. It doesn't have a responsive UI."
"The only problem with ForgeRock is that it is derived from an open-source product, so sometimes it's a bit unstable."
"It should have a better user interface. Its flexibility should also be improved. It is not about simplifying; it is more about flexibility. Each company has its own requirements, and ForgeRock can provide more flexibility in terms of the use of existing modules to implement features for the customers."
"Automatic Deployment needs improvement. it could be made easier."
"Self service center is not always easy to understand."
"The solution is a bit pricey for some regions."
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Cons →
More IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence Pricing and Cost Advice →
ForgeRock is ranked 6th in Identity Management (IM) with 27 reviews while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is ranked 21st in Identity Management (IM) with 2 reviews. ForgeRock is rated 8.0, while IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of ForgeRock writes "Governance and access management solution used for multi-factor authentication that is outdated with an unresponsive UI". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence writes "We use the solution to ensure organizations conform to industry base certifications and best practices". ForgeRock is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, PingID, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Symantec Siteminder, whereas IBM Security Identity Governance and Intelligence is most compared with SailPoint IdentityIQ, Microsoft Identity Manager, Saviynt and CyberArk Privileged Access Manager.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
